首页> 外文OA文献 >Relative Risk of High-Danger Industries in China from 2004 to 2016
【2h】

Relative Risk of High-Danger Industries in China from 2004 to 2016

机译:2004年至2016年中国高危产业的相对风险

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Accidents in high-danger industries in China occur frequently and cause loss of life, injuries, and economic loss. One of the most important reasons causing severe safety situations is the lack of knowledge on macro industry risk in the practice and academic field in China. In order to solve this problem, the method to calculate group risk and individual risk, concerning risk aversion, is discussed, selected, and improved. The group risks and individual risks of five high-danger industries from 2004 to 2016 are calculated. Relative risk indices between five high-danger industries during the 11th and 12th Five-Year Guideline for National Economic and Social Development (FYP) are determined. The results show that there are some differences between group risk and individual risk of high-danger industries. The reasons for differences and the connections with published interventions are discussed. Through discussion, two different ways to reduce group risk and individual risk are identified, which could help supervisors inspect the actual effectiveness of safety policies, measures, and interventions and choose a better way to reduce risk and ensure work safety in industries.
机译:中国高危产业的事故经常出现,导致生命,伤害和经济损失丧失。引起严重安全情况的最重要原因之一是对中国实践和学术领域的宏观行业风险缺乏知识。为了解决这个问题,讨论了计算组风险和个人风险的方法,选择,并改善了风险厌恶。计算了来自2004年至2016年的五个高危险产业的集团风险和个人风险。确定了第十六届高危险产业之间的相对风险指标,在第11届和第12届国家经济和社会发展(FYP)指南期间。结果表明,团体风险与高危产的个人风险之间存在一些差异。讨论了差异和与公布干预措施的联系的原因。通过讨论,确定了两种不同的方法,减少团体风险和个人风险,可以帮助主管检查安全政策,措施和干预的实际效力,并选择更好的方式降低风险,并确保行业的工作安全。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号