As a political economy scholar, Francis Fukuyama will always be remembered for “theudend of history” thesis. He has made no secrets regarding his affiliation toudneoconservatism and his close involvement in the implementation of the Pax Americanaudagenda through the Project for the New American Century. However, post-Septemberud11, 2001 or widely known as 9/11, has led Fukuyuma to believe that the neoconservativeudapproaches in the war against terrorism are flawed. This article tries to demonstrate theudextent of Fukuyama’s disillusionments and his proposals to reinvigorate United States’udforeign policy in his new book, After the Neocons (2006). What seems clear is thatudFukuyama still defends neoconservatism as a good approach. Should the idea ofuddemocratisation be perceived as effectively practised, the neoconservatives should payudmore attention to the aspect of political development
展开▼
机译：作为政治经济学学者，弗朗西斯·福山（Francis Fukuyama）的“历史论历史”论文将永远被人们铭记。他对 udneoconservationism的隶属关系以及他通过“新美国世纪计划”密切参与了Pax Americana udagenda的实施工作并没有任何秘密。但是，2001年9月11日后的日期或广为人知的9/11导致福尤马认为反恐战争中的新保守主义方法是有缺陷的。本文力图在他的新书《新保守主义者》（After the Neocons，2006年）中论证福山的幻想破灭的令人沮丧，以及他为振兴美国的外交政策所提出的建议。似乎很清楚，福山仍然捍卫新保守主义是一个很好的方法。如果认为民主化的想法得到了有效的实践，新保守派应该更加注意政治发展的方面。
展开▼
