首页> 外文OA文献 >Assessment of extreme flows and uncertainty under climate change: disentangling the uncertainty contribution of representative concentration pathways, global climate models and internal climate variability
【2h】

Assessment of extreme flows and uncertainty under climate change: disentangling the uncertainty contribution of representative concentration pathways, global climate models and internal climate variability

机译:气候变化下极端流动和不确定性的评估:解除代表集中途径,全球气候模型和内部气候变异性的不确定性贡献

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Projections of streamflow, particularly of extreme flows under climate change, are essential for future water resources management and the development of adaptation strategies to floods and droughts. However, these projections are subject to uncertainties originating from different sources. In this study, we explored the possible changes in future streamflow, particularly for high and low flows, under climate change in the Qu River basin, eastern China. ANOVA (analysis of variance) was employed to quantify the contribution of different uncertainty sources from RCPs (representative concentration pathways), GCMs (global climate models) and internal climatevariability, using an ensemble of 4 RCP scenarios, 9 GCMs and 1000 simulated realizations of each model–scenario combination by SDRM-MCREM (a stochastic daily rainfall model coupling a Markov chain model with a rainfall event model). The results show that annual mean flow and high flows are projected to increase and that low flows will probably decrease in 2041–2070 (2050s) and 2071–2100 (2080s) relative to the historical period of 1971–2000, suggesting a higher risk of floods and droughts in the future in the Qu River basin, especially for the late 21st century. Uncertainty in mean flows is mostly attributed to GCM uncertainty. For high flows and low flows, internal climate variability and GCM uncertainty are two major uncertainty sources for the 2050s and 2080s, while for the 2080s, the effect of RCP uncertainty becomes more pronounced, particularly for low flows. The findings in this study can help water managers to become more knowledgeable about and get a better understanding of streamflow projections and support decision making regarding adaptations to a changing climate under uncertainty in the Qu River basin.
机译:径流的预测,尤其是极端气候变化条件下流动,是未来水资源管理和适应战略,洪水和干旱的发展至关重要。然而,这些预测都受到来自不同来源的不确定性。在这项研究中,我们探讨了未来径流可能发生的变化,特别是对高,低流量,在曲河流域,中国东部气候变化条件下。 ANOVA(方差分析)用来量化的不同的不确定性来源从垃圾收集站(代表浓度途径),GCMS(全球气候模式)和内部climatevariability的贡献,使用4个RCP方案中,9个GCMS和每1000种模拟实现方式的合奏通过SDRM-MCREM(随机日雨量模型耦合带雨量事件模型一个Markov链模型)模型的情况下的组合。结果表明,年平均流量和高流量预计将增加,而且低流量将在2041-2070可能减少相对于1971 - 2000年的历史时期(2050年)和2171至00年(21世纪80年代),这表明风险较高洪水和干旱在曲河流域的未来,尤其是在21世纪后期。在平均流量不确定性主要是归因于GCM的不确定性。对于高流量和低流量,内部气候变异性和不确定性GCM是21世纪50年代和21世纪80年代两个主要来源的不确定性,而对于21世纪80年代,RCP不确定性的影响变得更加显着,特别是对于低流量。在这个研究的结果可以帮助水管理人员更加了解和更好地理解径流预测和支持决策关于调整下的曲河流域的不确定性变化的气候。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号