首页> 外文OA文献 >Current clinical practice in disabling and chronic migraine in the primary care setting: results from the European My-LIFE anamnesis survey
【2h】

Current clinical practice in disabling and chronic migraine in the primary care setting: results from the European My-LIFE anamnesis survey

机译:当前在初级保健环境中禁用和慢性偏头痛的当前临床实践:欧洲我的生活厌氧调查结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Background Migraine is a prevalent and disabling headache disorder that affects more than 1.04 billion individuals world-wide. It can result in reduction in quality of life, increased disability, and high socio-economic burden. Nevertheless, and despite the availability of evidence-based national and international guidelines, the management of migraine patients often remains suboptimal, especially for chronic migraine (CM) patients. Methods My-LIFE anamnesis project surveyed 201 General practitioners (GPs) from 5 European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK) with the aim of understanding chronic migraine (CM) patients’ management in the primary care setting. Results In our survey, GPs diagnosed episodic migraine (EM) more often than CM (87% vs 61%, p < 0.001). We found that many CM patients were not properly managed or referred to specialists, in contrast to guidelines recommendations. The main tools used by primary-care physicians included clinical interview, anamnesis guide, and patient diary. Tools used at the first visit differed from those used at follow-up visits. Up to 82% of GPs reported being responsible for management of patients diagnosed with disabling or CM and did not refer them to a specialist. Even when the GP had reported referring CM patients to a specialist, 97% of them were responsible for their follow-up. Moreover, the treatment prescribed, both acute and preventive, was not in accordance with local and international recommendations. GPs reported that they evaluated the efficacy of the treatment prescribed mainly through patient perception, and the frequency of follow-up visits was not clearly established in the primary care setting. These results suggest that CM is underdiagnosed and undertreated; thereby its management is suboptimal in the primary care. Conclusions There is a need of guidance in the primary care setting to both leverage the management of CM patients and earlier referral to specialists, when appropriate.
机译:摘要背景偏头痛是一种普遍存存的和致残性紊乱,影响全世界超过104亿个人。它可以降低生命质量,增加残疾和高社会经济负担。尽管如此,尽管提供了基于证据的国家和国际指导方针,但偏头痛患者的管理通常仍然是次优,特别是对于慢性偏头痛(CM)患者。方法采用5欧洲国家(法国,德国,意大利,西班牙和英国)调查的201个普通从业人员(GPS)调查201普通从业人员(GPS),旨在了解初级保健环境中的慢性偏头痛(CM)患者管理。结果在我们的调查中,GPS诊断为癫痫发球菌(EM)更常见于厘米(87%Vs 61%,P <0.001)。与准则建议相比,我们发现许多患者未被适当管理或提交专家。初级保健医生使用的主要工具包括临床面试,anamnesies指南和患者日记。第一次访问中使用的工具不同于随访访问中使用的工具。高达82%的GPS报告称,负责患有禁用或厘米的患者的管理,并没有将它们转到专家。即使GP报告将CM患者报告给专家,其中97%的人负责他们的后续行动。此外,急性和预防性规定的治疗不符合当地和国际建议。 GPS报道,他们评估了主要通过患者感知所规定的治疗的疗效,后续访问的频率在初级保健环境中没有明确建立。这些结果表明CM不足并下降;因此,其管理在初级保健中是次优。结论初级保健设施需要指导,既适当的统计患者的管理和早期转诊。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号