首页> 外文OA文献 >Eficácia e segurança dos antipsicóticos atípicos (quetiapina, risperidona, aripiprazol, paliperidona) em comparação com um placebo ou medicamentos antipsicóticos típicos no tratamento da esquizofrenia refratária: overview de revisão sistemática
【2h】

Eficácia e segurança dos antipsicóticos atípicos (quetiapina, risperidona, aripiprazol, paliperidona) em comparação com um placebo ou medicamentos antipsicóticos típicos no tratamento da esquizofrenia refratária: overview de revisão sistemática

机译:与安慰剂或典型抗精神病药相比,非典型抗精神病药(喹硫平,利培酮,阿立哌唑,帕潘立酮)在难治性精神分裂症中的疗效和安全性:系统综述

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: According to some cohort studies, the prevalence of refractory schizophrenia (RS) is 20-40%. Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of aripiprazole, paliperidone, quetiapine and risperidone for treating RS. METHODS: This was a critical appraisal of Cochrane reviews published in the Cochrane Library, supplemented with reference to more recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on RS. The following databases were searched: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (Medline) (1966-2009), Controlled Trials of the Cochrane Collaboration (2009, Issue 2), Embase (Excerpta Medica) (1980-2009), Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (Lilacs) (1982-2009). There was no language restriction. Randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses evaluating atypical antipsychotics for treating RS were included. RESULTS: Seven Cochrane systematic reviews and 10 additional RCTs were included in this review. The data generally showed minor differences between the atypical antipsychotics evaluated and typical antipsychotics, regarding improvement in disease symptoms, despite better adherence to treatment with atypical antipsychotics. Risperidone was specifically evaluated in patients with RS in one of the systematic reviews included, with favorable outcomes, but without definitive superiority compared with other drugs of proven efficacy, like amisulpride, clozapine and olanzapine. CONCLUSIONS: The findings underscore the difficulty in treating these patients, with high dropout rates and treatment patterns of modest improvement in assessments of effectiveness. Atypical antipsychotics have advantages over typical antipsychotics mainly through their better safety profile, which leads to better adherence to treatment. A combination of antipsychotics may also be an option for some refractory patients.
机译:背景与目的:根据一些队列研究,难治性精神分裂症(RS)的患病率为20-40%。我们的目的是评估阿立哌唑,帕潘立酮,喹硫平和利培酮治疗RS的有效性和安全性。方法:这是对Cochrane库中发表的Cochrane评论的重要评价,并补充了关于RS的最新随机对照试验(RCT)。搜索以下数据库:在线医学文献分析和检索系统(Medline)(1966-2009年),Cochrane合作的对照试验(2009年第2期),Embase(Excerpta Medica)(1980-2009年),拉丁美洲裔美国人Literatura e do do Caribe emCiênciasdaSaúde(丁香)(1982-2009)。没有语言限制。包括随机对照试验,系统评价和评估非典型抗精神病药治疗RS的荟萃分析。结果:该评价包括7篇Cochrane系统评价和10篇其他RCT。数据通常显示,尽管对非典型抗精神病药的依从性更好,但评估的非典型抗精神病药与典型抗精神病药之间在疾病症状改善方面存在细微差异。在包括RS在内的系统评价之一中,对利培酮进行了专门的评估,结果令人满意,但与其他证明有效疗效的药物(如氨磺必利,氯氮平和奥氮平)相比,其无明显优势。结论:这些发现强调了在治疗这些患者方面的困难,辍学率高和治疗模式在有效性评估中的适度改善。非典型抗精神病药优于典型抗精神病药的优势主要是因为它们具有更好的安全性,从而可以更好地坚持治疗。对于某些难治性患者,也可以选择联合使用抗精神病药。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号