首页> 外文OA文献 >The precautionary principle: torn between biodiversity, environment-related food safety and the WTO
【2h】

The precautionary principle: torn between biodiversity, environment-related food safety and the WTO

机译:预防原则:生物多样性,环境相关食品安全与WTO之间的撕裂

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

At the WTO, the precautionary principle/approach is considered as a protectionary mechanism, i.e. and alleged justification for potentially WTO-illegal trade restrictions. This article presents a survey of some pronouncements of the WTO's Dispute Settlement Body including two case studies at opposite ends of the spectrum with regard to the operationalisation of the PP. The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety has gone further than any other multilateral environmental agreement in specifying the application of precaution. It regulates the measures a member country may take in order to limit or ban the importation of living modified organisms such as seeds or GM commodities. On the other hand there is the Codex Alimentarius that is the WTO's reference point for food safety. Although it has discussed precautionary measures extensively, consensus looks unlikely here in the near future. We shall limit our discussion of the Codex to environment-related food safety, specifically GM food.
机译:在WTO,预防原则/方法被视为一种保护机制,即涉及潜在WTO非法贸易限制的理由。本文对世贸组织争端解决机构的一些明文进行了调查,包括在频谱的相反目的的两种案例研究,关于PP的运作。 Cartagena关于生物安全的协议比任何其他多边环境协定在指定预防措施的应用方面进一步走了。它规定了会员国可能采取的措施,以限制或禁止进口种子或通用商品等生活改性生物的进口。另一方面,Codex Alimentarius是WTO的食品安全参考点。虽然它已经讨论了预防性措施,但在不久的将来,共识在这里不太可能。我们将利用对与环境相关食品安全,特别是转基因食物的食品法典的讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号