首页> 外文OA文献 >The Other Bomber Battle An Examination of the Problems that arose between the Air Staff and the AOC Bomber Command between 1942 and 1945 and their Effects on the Strategic Bomber Offensive
【2h】

The Other Bomber Battle An Examination of the Problems that arose between the Air Staff and the AOC Bomber Command between 1942 and 1945 and their Effects on the Strategic Bomber Offensive

机译:另一架轰炸机战役:对1942年至1945年期间空军参谋部和AOC轰炸机司令部之间出现的问题及其对战略轰炸机进攻的影响的考察

摘要

In addition to the lonely battles fought by Bomber Command crews in the night skies over Germany from February 1942 to May 1945 there was an equally intense if much less bloody struggle in the halls of power between the Air Staff and the AOC Bomber Command, concerning the best employment of the strategic bomber forces. The argument of this study is that the Royal Air Force s contribution to the strategic air offensive was badly mismanaged: that Air Chief Marshal Sir Arthur Harris, Air Officer Commanding-in-Chief Bomber Command, from 22 February 1942 to the end of the war, by ignoring, or often over-riding the Air Staff, affected not only the course but also the duration of the Second World War. Most histories of the bomber war provide the result of the disagreements between the Chief of the Air Staff, Marshal of the Royal Air Force Sir Charles Portal and Harris, but rarely are the problems discussed in detail. This thesis examines the arguments that were raised by the various authorities, together with the refutations presented not only by the major participants, but also by the advisers to those authorities. The significant feature of the disagreements was that while Harris acted unilaterally, the Air Staff reached consensus decisions. Unfortunately, the decisions reached by the Air Staff on major issues were all too frequently either ignored or subverted by the AOC Bomber Command. One significant feature of the refutations presented to Harris was their dependence on the operational experience gained earlier in the bomber war by junior members of the Air Staff. For too long the direction of the war had been left in the hands of senior officers whose previous service had become irrelevant to war requirements in the 1940s. By 1942, comparatively junior officers were thus tendering advice to senior officers who, in the case of AOC Bomber Command, resented the authority which, Harris argued, had apparently been accorded these juniors. Harris was unable to accept that they were advisers and were never in a position to issue orders: orders could only come from Portal. Finally, this thesis provides an analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the major participants and argues that, had the war been conducted as the Air Staff required, victory would have been achieved earlier than May 1945.
机译:除了从1942年2月到1945年5月,轰炸机司令部的工作人员在德国上空的夜空中进行的孤独战斗外,空军参谋部和AOC轰炸机司令部之间的权力斗争也进行了同样激烈的,甚至更少的流血斗争,涉及战略轰炸机部队的最佳雇佣。这项研究的论点是,英国皇家空军对战略空中进攻的贡献受到了严重的管理不当:空军元帅突击队司令亚瑟·哈里斯爵士从1942年2月22日至战争结束忽视或经常压倒空军参谋部,不仅影响了第二次世界大战的进程,而且影响了第二次世界大战的持续时间。轰炸机战争的大多数历史是空军参谋长,皇家空军元帅查尔斯·波塔尔爵士和哈里斯之间意见分歧的结果,但很少讨论这些问题。本文研究了各个主管部门提出的论点,以及主要参与者,以及这些主管部门的顾问提出的驳斥。分歧的重要特征在于,尽管哈里斯单方面采取行动,但空军参谋部达成了共识性决定。不幸的是,空军参谋长在重大问题上做出的决定经常被空运轰炸机司令部忽略或颠覆。向哈里斯提出的反驳的一个重要特点是他们依赖于空军参谋部初级成员在轰炸机战争初期获得的作战经验。战争的方向留在了高级官员手中,而高级官员的先前任职与1940年代的战争要求无关。到1942年,相对较低的军官就向高级军官提供建议,在AOC轰炸机司令部的情况下,哈里斯认为,这些权威显然被赋予了这些初级军官。哈里斯无法接受他们是顾问,也永远无法发出订单:订单只能来自Portal。最后,本文对主要参与者的优势和劣势进行了分析,并指出,如果按照空军参谋部的要求进行战争,胜利将早于1945年5月完成。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cording Rex Frederick;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2006
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号