首页> 外文OA文献 >Plenitudes of Painting: Wilhelm Worringer and the Relationshipbetween Abstraction and Representation in European Paintingat the Beginning of the Twentieth Century
【2h】

Plenitudes of Painting: Wilhelm Worringer and the Relationshipbetween Abstraction and Representation in European Paintingat the Beginning of the Twentieth Century

机译:绘画的丰富性:威廉·沃林格和二十世纪初欧洲绘画中抽象与表现的关系

摘要

Throughout the twentieth century, the relationship between representation and abstraction has been regarded predominantly in terms of opposition. One of the prominent early twentieth-century defenders of this approach is Wilhelm Worringer (1881-1965), who introduces representation and abstraction as antithetic modes of art-making in Abstraction and Empathy. A Contribution to the Psychology of Style (1908). However, while he distinguishes between abstraction and representation on theoretical grounds, Worringer also observes that, in the history of art, these modes of art-making coexist.The current thesis examines Worringer’s approach to the writing of art history and theory, inquiring into his perspective on the personal responses of viewers and artists to the world, and the manifestations of these responses in art. Abstraction and Empathy addresses issues of empathy, form, and will, in aesthetics and art-making; it discusses and extends the writings of Theodor Lipps, Immanuel Kant, Arthur Schopenhauer, and Alois Riegl. At the beginning of the twentieth century, Worringer’s book attracted much attention: like its sequel, Form in Gothic (1910), it was often associated with the rise to prominence of Expressionism in Germany. Later in the twentieth century, Worringer’s thought came under the scrutiny of Rudolf Arnheim, who criticized Worringer’s emphasis on abstract-representational opposition. Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari praised Worringer’s approach to antithesis, yet questioned the terms Worringer proposed as opposites. For Arnheim, Deleuze and Guattari, alternatives to the antithesis between abstraction and representation became visible. Indeed, in Worringer’s time, artists such as Adolf Hildebrand, Ferdinand Hodler, Paul Cézanne, Claude Monet and Wassily Kandinsky underscored the common grounds between representation and abstraction. Exploring Worringer’s Abstraction and Empathy and Form in Gothic, as well as the words and works of Hildebrand, Hodler, Cézanne, Monet and Kandinsky, this thesis aims to highlight abstract-representational interplay as observable in early twentieth-century writing and art-making.
机译:在整个二十世纪,代表和抽象之间的关系主要被视为反对派。二十世纪早期这种方法的杰出捍卫者之一是威廉·沃林格(Wilhelm Worringer,1881-1965年),他在抽象和共情中引入了表示和抽象作为对立的艺术创作模式。对风格心理学的贡献(1908年)。然而,沃林格在从理论上区分抽象和表现的同时,也观察到在艺术史上,这些艺术创作模式是并存的。本论文考察了沃林格在艺术史和理论写作上的方法。观察者和艺术家对世界的个人反应,以及这些反应在艺术中的体现。抽象和同理心解决美学和艺术创作中的同理心,形式和意志问题。它讨论并扩展了Theodor Lipps,Immanuel Kant,Arthur Schopenhauer和Alois Riegl的著作。二十世纪初,沃林格的书引起了很多关注:就像续集《哥特形式》(Form in Gothic,1910年)一样,它经常与德国表现主义的兴起联系在一起。在20世纪后期,沃林格的思想受到了鲁道夫·阿恩海姆(Rudolf Arnheim)的审查,后者批评了沃林格强调抽象代表制反对派。吉尔斯·德勒兹(Gilles Deleuze)和费利克斯·瓜塔里(FélixGuattari)称赞了沃林格(Worringer)对立的方法,但对沃林格(Worringer)提出的相反术语提出了质疑。对于阿恩海姆(Arnheim),德勒兹(Deleuze)和瓜塔里(Guattari),抽象和表示之间对立的替代方案变得可见。确实,在Worringer时代,阿道夫·希尔德布兰德,费迪南德·霍德勒,保罗·塞尚,克劳德·莫奈和瓦西里·康定斯基等艺术家都强调了表示和抽象之间的共同点。探索哥特式的Worringer的抽象,同理心和形式,以及Hildebrand,Hodler,Cézanne,Monet和Kandinsky的文字和作品,本论文旨在强调抽象代表相互作用在20世纪早期的写作和艺术创作中可以观察到。

著录项

  • 作者

    Silaghi Cristina;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号