首页> 外文OA文献 >Mothers are less efficient in employing prosodic disambiguation in child-directed speech than non-mothers : is there a trade-off between affective and linguistic prosody?
【2h】

Mothers are less efficient in employing prosodic disambiguation in child-directed speech than non-mothers : is there a trade-off between affective and linguistic prosody?

机译:母亲在针对儿童的语言中运用韵律歧义消除的效率不如非母亲:情感和语言韵律之间是否需要权衡?

摘要

This study examines prosodic disambiguation inudchild-directed (CD) speech. Twenty-four mothersudaddressed syntactically ambiguous sentences toudtheir 2;0 to 3;8 year old child and to an adult confederate.udTwenty-four non-mothers addressed anudimaginary toddler and an imaginary adult. Weudfound that only mothers increased pitch and producedudthe CD-typical pitch excursions when addressingudtheir children. In contrast, non-mothers,udbut not mothers, used prosodic disambiguation inudCD speech, which was corroborated by a forcedudchoice test in which 48 listeners judged the intendedudmeaning of each sentence. The results suggestudthat if speakers express genuine positive affect,udthey tend to emphasise affective prosody at the expenseudof linguistic prosody. In the case of CDudspeech, this communication strategy may be moreudeffective as it serves to elicit the child’s attention.
机译:这项研究探讨了 udchild定向(CD)语音中的韵律歧义消除。 24位母亲对2; 0至3; 8岁的孩子和成人同盟者在句法上模棱两可的句子。 ud24位非母亲对超想象的小孩和假想的成年人讲话。我们发现,只有母亲会在与孩子互动时增加音调,并产生CD典型的音调偏移。相比之下,非母亲(而不是母亲)在udCD语音中使用了韵律歧义消除,这通过强制性 udchoice测试得到证实,其中48位听众判断每个句子的意图 ud意义。结果表明, (如果为讲者“ ”),“ ”,“ ”,“ ”,“ ”和“ ”。在CD udspeech的情况下,这种交流策略可能更有效,因为它可以引起孩子的注意。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号