首页> 外文OA文献 >Thomas Sharp's collaboration with H. de C. Hastings: The formulation of townscape as urban design pedagogy
【2h】

Thomas Sharp's collaboration with H. de C. Hastings: The formulation of townscape as urban design pedagogy

机译:托马斯·夏普(Thomas Sharp)与H·德·C·黑斯廷斯(H. de C. Hastings)的合作:将城市景观设计为城市设计教学法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper focuses on the collaboration between the Architectural Review's (AR) chief editor and proprietor Hubert de Cronin Hastings (1902-1986) and planner Thomas Sharp (1901-1978) in the formulation and dissemination of Townscape as urban design pedagogy in the period between 1935 and 1955. This pedagogy proved effective in questioning the modernist planning attitude defined by the CIAM congresses and the prevalent Garden City mentality of the New Town proposals during post-World War II reconstruction efforts. Growing out of the shared interests and ideological affinities of the people engaged in British post-war reconstruction, 'Townscape' emerged as the result of a collective effort of those affiliated with Hastings for which Nikolaus Pevsner, Thomas Sharp and Gordon Cullen assumed major roles. If the Architectural Press has been the linchpin of this propagation by several books including those by Sharp and the articles published within AR, Sharp's role as a practicing planning consultant was influential, but more importantly institutional in disseminating 'Townscape'. The intermittent collaboration between Hastings and Sharp was a part of Hastings's unrelenting effort in conceptualizing a model of environmental intervention linked to ideals of cultural continuity. Townscape series remained a part of AR during Hastings's editorial reign for more than a quarter century, repeating the same message for different contextual cases as an instrument of teaching its readers how to perceive, visualize and intervene into the urban environment, as much as Townscape was an inseparable component of Sharp's career as planner, lecturer and author that established precedents for many planners to follow.
机译:本文着重于《建筑评论》的主编兼所有人休伯特·德·克罗宁·黑斯廷斯(1902-1986年)和规划师托马斯·夏普(1901-1978年)之间在城市规划教育方法学的建立和传播方面的合作。 1935年和1955年。这种教学方法有效地质疑了CIAM大会确定的现代主义规划态度以及二战后重建工作中新市镇提案中流行的花园城市心态。在英国战后重建的人们的共同利益和意识形态亲和力的帮助下,“ Townscape”的出现是由与黑斯廷斯有联系的人们共同努力的结果,尼古拉斯·佩夫斯纳,托马斯·夏普和戈登·库伦为此起了主要作用。如果建筑出版社一直是包括夏普(Sharp)的书和AR中发表的文章在内的几本书的传播的关键,夏普(Sharp)作为一名实践规划顾问的作用是有影响力的,但更重要的是在传播“ Townscape”方面具有制度性。黑斯廷斯和夏普之间的断断续续的合作是黑斯廷斯不懈努力的一部分,旨在概念化与文化连续性理想相关的环境干预模型。在黑斯廷斯(Hastings)编辑统治超过25年的时间里,Townscape系列仍然是AR的一部分,它针对不同的情境案例重复了相同的信息,以此来教读者如何感知,可视化和干预城市环境。夏普作为计划者,讲师和作家的职业不可分割的一部分,为许多计划者树立了先例。

著录项

  • 作者

    Erten Erdem;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号