首页> 美国政府科技报告 >Comparison of Agricultural Nonpoint Source Runoff from No-Till and Conventional Till Vegetable Crop Test Plots
【24h】

Comparison of Agricultural Nonpoint Source Runoff from No-Till and Conventional Till Vegetable Crop Test Plots

机译:免耕和常规直播蔬菜作物试验区农业非点源径流的比较

获取原文

摘要

Vegetable farming is an important industry in the coastal areas of S.C. The coastal estuary waters also serve as a nursery ground for numerous species of fish and shellfish. In recent years there have been several fish kills in estuarine tidal creeks that were adjacent to vegetable fields. The increased usage of a no-till farming method, employing a black plastic mulch was thought to possibly exacerbate the potential for pesticide runoff. The study compared the pesticide lost from this no-till, black plastic mulch tillage method versus conventional tillage. Losses of the insecticides endosulfan and fenvalerate from small coastal plots were measured. Simulated rainfall was provided by an irrigation system. The plastic mulch plot produced a greater volume of runoff as expected, but the mass of endosulfan lost was essentially the same as for conventional tillage, less than 0.4% of the mass applied. For fenvalerate, the mass losses were not more than 0.4% of the mass applied. The greater runoff volume though from the plastic mulch may enable this edge of field pesticide loss to actually reach and enter the estuary waters.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号