首页> 美国政府科技报告 >Counter-IED PPE Horizon 0, Phase 1 Human Factors Trial: Performance Evaluation of Soft Armour Personal Protective Equipment (Essai Ergonomique du Projet Horizon 0 d'EPI a l'Epreuve des IED, Phase 1: Evaluation du Rendement d'un Equipement de Protection Individual en Materiel Souple)
【24h】

Counter-IED PPE Horizon 0, Phase 1 Human Factors Trial: Performance Evaluation of Soft Armour Personal Protective Equipment (Essai Ergonomique du Projet Horizon 0 d'EPI a l'Epreuve des IED, Phase 1: Evaluation du Rendement d'un Equipement de Protection Individual en Materiel Souple)

机译:反IED ppE Horizo​​n 0,第1阶段人为因素试验:软装甲个人防护装备的性能评估(Essai Ergonomique du projet Horizo​​n 0 d'EpI a l'Epreuve des IED,phase 1:Evaluation du Rendement d'un Equipement de protection个人装备

获取原文

摘要

The nature of the threat from Improvised Explosive Devices (IED) has changed the pattern and probability of injury for both mounted and dismounted personnel. The aim of the Horizon 0 Phase 1 and Phase 1a trials was to investigate the impact of various soft armour options on soldier mobility. The trials considered soldier task performance as well as soldier acceptance and comfort. The soft armour options varied in stiffness/flexibility, weight, bulk, and protection levels. Phase 1 was a five-day trial with twenty reserve soldiers and Phase 1a was a two day trial with eleven reserve soldiers. Participants undertook a battery of human factors tests while wearing test conditions in a repeated measures design. Fit, Range of Motion (ROM), discrete mobility, and compatibility test stands were conducted followed by dynamic assessments of mobility and agility. Data collection included questionnaires, focus groups, compatibility scores, performance measures, and Human Factors (HF) observer assessments. Test conditions used the Modular Tactical Body Armour System (MTBAS) armour carrier design, with modular add-on groin, neck, throat, and brassard protection. In general all conditions were in the acceptable range (greater than 4), with the exception of condition A (10 plies KM2 600 + 9 plies FR10 with 1.9 kg plates) from Phase 1a and condition Ninitial (2.1 kg/m2 KM2 400 (N1), 5.4 kg/m2 Spectra Shield (N3) with 1.4 kg plates) in Phase 1. It appears that bulk is a more detrimental factor to soldier acceptance than stiffness. Areal density has moderate predictive value of soldier acceptance of soft armour; however, there seems to be another factor not accounted for in measures of areal density influencing soldier acceptance as strongly as areal density. In Phase 1, Ninitial was constructed with overlapping fills N1 and N3.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号