首页> 美国政府科技报告 >RIMAIR (Retail Inventory Model Aviation) Versus ASO (Aviation Supply Office) Policy: A Comparative Analysis of Two Methods for Determining AVCAL (Aviation Consolidated Allowance List) Stockage Levels.
【24h】

RIMAIR (Retail Inventory Model Aviation) Versus ASO (Aviation Supply Office) Policy: A Comparative Analysis of Two Methods for Determining AVCAL (Aviation Consolidated Allowance List) Stockage Levels.

机译:RImaIR(航空零售库存模型)与asO(航空供应办公室)政策:两种确定aVCaL(航空综合配额清单)库存水平的方法的比较分析。

获取原文

摘要

The allocation of spare parts for deployed Naval aircraft is delineated by an aviation consolidated allowance list (AVCAL). The current policy for stocking AVCAL's has been found inadequate to meet the Chief of Naval Operations' (CNO) goal for stockage level effectiveness. This led to the development of the Retail Inventory Model, Aviation (RIMAIR) as an alternative stockage policy. This thesis compares the two models on the basis of stockage level effectiveness (ratio of demands filled to total demands) and the availability afforded three hypothetical systems. The RIMAIR model allows the budget constraint to dictate stockage levels while the current policy is deterministic. However, RIMAIR stockage levels are bounded by both a minimum and maximum constraint which limit its flexibility. As a result, RIMAIR stockage levels and total cost are considerably higher than currently allowed. The effectiveness and availability measures are also much higher. A modified RIMAIR model provided increased effectiveness and availability on an equal cost basis with the current policy. (Author)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号