...
首页> 外文期刊>Somatosensory & motor research >Comparison of sensory tests and neuronal quantity of peripheral nerves between streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rats and paclitaxel (PAC)-treated rats
【24h】

Comparison of sensory tests and neuronal quantity of peripheral nerves between streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rats and paclitaxel (PAC)-treated rats

机译:链脲佐菌素(STZ)诱导的糖尿病大鼠与紫杉醇(PAC)治疗的大鼠的感觉测试和周围神经神经元数量的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) and chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) are different disease entities, they share similar neuropathic symptoms that impede quality of life for these patients. Despite having very similar downstream effects, there have been no direct comparisons between DPN and CIPN with respect to symptom severity and therapeutic responses. We compared peripheral nerve damage due to hyperglycemia with that caused by paclitaxel (PAC) treatment as represented by biochemical parameters, diverse sensory tests, and immunohistochemistry of cutaneous and sciatic nerves. The therapeutic effects of alpha-lipoic acid and DA-9801 were also compared in the two models. Animals were divided into seven groups (n=7-10) as follows: normal, diabetes (DM), DM+alpha-lipoic acid 100mg/kg (ALA), DM+DA-9801 (100mg/kg), paclitaxel-treated rat (PAC), PAC+ALA (100mg/kg), and PAC+DA-9801 (100mg/kg). The sensory thresholds of animals to mechanical, heat, and pressure stimuli were altered by both hyperglycemia and PAC when compared with controls, and the responses to sensory tests were different between both groups. There were no significant differences in the biochemical markers of blood glutathione between DM and PAC groups (p>.05). Quantitative comparisons of peripheral nerves by intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) analysis indicated that the DM and PAC groups were similar (6.18 +/- 1.03 vs. 5.01 +/- 2.57). IENFD was significantly improved after ALA and DA-9801 treatment in diabetic animals (7.6 +/- 1.28, 7.7 +/- 1.28, respectively, p<.05) but did not reach significance in the PAC-treated groups (6.05 +/- 1.76, 5.66 +/- 1.26, respectively, p>.05). Sciatic nerves were less damaged in the PAC-treated groups compared with the DM groups with respect to axonal diameter and area (8.60 +/- 1.14m vs. 6.66 +/- 1.07m, and 59.04 +/- 15.16m(2) vs. 35.71 +/- 11.2m(2), respectively, p<.05). Based on these results, the neuropathic manifestation and therapeutic responses of DPN may be different from other peripheral neuropathies. Therefore, specific pathogenic consideration according to peripheral neuropathy classification in addition to common treatments needs to be developed for management strategies of peripheral neuropathies.
机译:尽管糖尿病周围神经病变(DPN)和化疗引起的周围神经病变(CIPN)是不同的疾病实体,但它们具有类似的神经病变症状,这些症状阻碍了这些患者的生活质量。尽管下游效应非常相似,但DPN和CIPN在症状严重程度和治疗反应方面尚无直接比较。我们比较了由高血糖引起的周围神经损伤与紫杉醇(PAC)治疗引起的损伤,以生化参数,各种感觉测试以及皮肤和坐骨神经的免疫组织化学为代表。还在两个模型中比较了α-硫辛酸和DA-9801的治疗效果。将动物分为以下七个组(n = 7-10):正常,糖尿病(DM),DM +α-硫辛酸100mg / kg(ALA),DM + DA-9801(100mg / kg),紫杉醇治疗大鼠(PAC),PAC + ALA(100mg / kg)和PAC + DA-9801(100mg / kg)。与对照组相比,高血糖和PAC改变了动物对机械,热和压力刺激的感觉阈值,并且两组之间对感觉测试的反应也不同。 DM组和PAC组之间的血液谷胱甘肽生化指标没有显着差异(p> .05)。通过表皮内神经纤维密度(IENFD)分析对周围神经进行定量比较表明,DM组和PAC组相似(6.18 +/- 1.03对5.01 +/- 2.57)。在糖尿病动物中,ALA和DA-9801治疗后IENFD显着改善(分别为7.6 +/- 1.28、7.7 +/- 1.28,p <.05),但在PAC治疗组中未达到显着水平(6.05 +/-分别为1.76、5.66 +/- 1.26,p> .05)。相对于DM组,在轴突直径和面积方面,与DM组相比,坐骨神经的损伤更少(8.60 +/- 1.14m对6.66 +/- 1.07m和59.04 +/- 15.16m(2)对分别为35.71 +/- 11.2m(2),p <.05)。基于这些结果,DPN的神经病变表现和治疗反应可能与其他周围神经病变不同。因此,除了针对周围神经病变的常规治疗方法外,还需要针对周围神经病变的治疗策略制定出具体的病原学考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号