首页> 外文期刊>Pediatric Pulmonology >Comparison of dynamic and passive measurements of respiratory mechanics in ventilated newborn infants.
【24h】

Comparison of dynamic and passive measurements of respiratory mechanics in ventilated newborn infants.

机译:动态和被动测量呼吸机能的新生儿的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Pulmonary mechanics may differ in intubated and ventilated infants depending on whether they are measured by a dynamic or passive method. The objective of this study was to compare respiratory mechanics measured by a dynamic technique with those obtained by a single-breath occlusion technique in ventilated newborn infants. Thirty-one preterm and 15 term infants (mean +/- SD: gestational age, 29.3 +/- 2.3 and 39.5 +/- 1.4 weeks; birth weight, 1.2 +/- 0.5 and 3.4 +/- 0.4 kg; postnatal age, 12 +/- 13 and 5 +/- 4 days, respectively) were studied. Flows were measured through a pneumotachometer placed between the endotracheal tube and the ventilator circuit: tidal volume by integration of flow, and airway pressure directly with a pressure transducer. Airway occlusion was performed with a Neonatal Occlusion Valve (Bicore pulmonary monitor) at the end of inspiration, and the following relaxed exhalation was analyzed to give passive respiratory system compliance (Crs) and resistance (Rrs). These values were compared with dynamic respiratory system compliance (Cdyn) and dynamic expiratory resistance (Re) obtained with the PEDS system (P) within 1 hour, without an esophageal balloon and on the same ventilator settings. Dynamic respiratory system compliance and resistance measured with the PEDS and the Bicore systems did not differ significantly and were well correlated. Mean Cdyn (P) values in preterm and term infants were 77% and 77% of Crs; the equation of the regression line was Cdyn = 0.75 Crs + 0.02 and Cdyn = 0.78 Crs - 0.02; and standard error of the estimate (SEE) was 0.2 and 0.3 mL/cmH2O with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.89 and 0.89 (P < 0.0001), respectively. The mean Re(P) values in preterm and term infants were 68% and 64% of Rrs, and the equation of the regression line was Re = 0.3 Rrs + 63 and Re = 0.5 Rrs + 20, with SEE of 25 and 20 cmH2O/L/sec, and r of 0.65 and 0.69 (P < 0.0001, P < 0.005), respectively. The two methods are non-invasive and were well tolerated. We conclude that passive and dynamic respiratory compliance and resistance measured in intubated infants are highly correlated, although the values measured by the passive technique are higher than those obtained by the dynamic technique.
机译:气管插管和通气婴儿的肺力学可能有所不同,这取决于通过动态或被动方法进行测量。这项研究的目的是比较动态技术测量的呼吸力学与通气新生儿通过单呼吸阻塞技术获得的呼吸力学。 31个早产儿和15个足月儿(平均+/- SD:胎龄,29.3 +/- 2.3和39.5 +/- 1.4周;出生体重,1.2 +/- 0.5和3.4 +/- 0.4 kg;出生后,分别研究了12 +/- 13天和5 +/- 4天。通过置于气管内导管和呼吸机回路之间的气压计测量流量:通过流量积分测量潮气量,并直接通过压力传感器测量气道压力。吸气结束时用新生儿闭塞阀(Bicore肺部监护仪)进行气道闭塞,并分析随后的放松呼气,以得出被动呼吸系统顺应性(Crs)和阻力(Rrs)。将这些值与在没有食管球囊且使用相同呼吸机设置的情况下,在1小时内用PEDS系统(P)获得的动态呼吸系统顺应性(Cdyn)和动态呼气阻力(Re)进行比较。用PEDS和Bicore系统测得的动态呼吸系统顺应性和阻力没有显着差异,并且相关性很好。早产和足月婴儿的平均Cdyn(P)值分别为Crs的77%和77%;回归线的方程为Cdyn = 0.75 Crs + 0.02和Cdyn = 0.78 Crs-0.02;估计的标准误差(SEE)为0.2和0.3 mL / cmH2O,相关系数(r)分别为0.89和0.89(P <0.0001)。早产儿和足月儿的平均Re(P)值分别为Rrs的68%和64%,回归线方程为Re = 0.3 Rrs + 63和Re = 0.5 Rrs + 20,SEE为25和20 cmH2O / L / sec,r分别为0.65和0.69(P <0.0001,P <0.005)。两种方法均为非侵入性且耐受性良好。我们得出的结论是,尽管通过被动技术测得的数值高于通过动态技术测得的数值,但在插管婴儿中测得的被动和动态呼吸顺应性与抵抗力高度相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号