首页> 外文期刊>Biological Conservation >A comparison of butterfly communities in native and agricultural riparian habitats in the Great Basin, USA
【24h】

A comparison of butterfly communities in native and agricultural riparian habitats in the Great Basin, USA

机译:美国大盆地本地和农业河岸生境中蝴蝶群落的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Lepidoptera communities in relatively undisturbed (nonagricultural) versus artificially created (agricultural) riparian habitats in the Walker River Basin in the western Great Basin (Nevada and California, USA). Habitat type did not significantly affect species richness. Butterfly abundance was greater, and evenness lower, in agricultural than in nonagricultural sites. Annual variability significantly affected species richness, total abundance, and evenness. The few species largely restricted to agricultural sites were geographically widespread and characteristic of disturbed habitats. Several relatively uncommon species were not present in agricultural sites. It is concluded that riparian habitats created to support agriculture may help support some native butterfly species, but cannot substitute for undisturbed riparian habitats.
机译:在西部大盆地(内华达州和美国加利福尼亚州)的沃克河盆地,相对不受干扰(非农业)和人工创造(农业)河岸生境的鳞翅目群落。栖息地类型没有显着影响物种丰富度。与非农业地点相比,农业中的蝴蝶丰度更高,均匀度更低。年度变异性显着影响物种的丰富度,总丰度和均匀度。少数主要限于农业场所的物种在地理上分布广泛,并具有受干扰的生境特征。在农业场所没有几种相对不常见的物种。结论是,为支持农业而创建的河岸生境可能有助于支持一些本地蝴蝶物种,但不能替代未受干扰的河岸生境。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号