首页> 外文期刊>Parasitology Today >OF LICE AND MEN - THE RETURN OF THE COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY DEBATE
【24h】

OF LICE AND MEN - THE RETURN OF THE COMPARATIVE PARASITOLOGY DEBATE

机译:作者:曾建平,L阳师范学院学报JOURNAL

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The question of whether or not parasite phylogeny provides information about host relationships ('comparative parasitology') reached a peak in 1957 in a vigorous debate between Gunther Timmermann and Ernst Mayr. Timmermann argued that parasites were associated with their hosts by descent and that this produced congruent host and parasite phylogenies. In contrast, Mayr argued that parasites were often associated by colonization and that this led to incongruence between host and parasite phylogenies. To test these differing views, Adrian Paterson, Russell Gray and Graham Wallis derived a procellariiform phylogeny. This tree is here compared with Timmermann's tree based on the relationships of feather lice. Timmermann's tree is more similar to the seabird phylogeny that would be expected by chance. Thus, support is found for the 'comparative parasitology' approach.
机译:在Gunther Timmermann和Ernst Mayr之间的激烈辩论中,关于寄生虫的系统发育是否提供有关宿主关系的信息(“比较寄生虫学”)的问题在1957年达到顶峰。蒂默曼认为,寄生虫通过下降而与其宿主相关联,并且这产生了一致的宿主和寄生虫系统发育。相反,Mayr认为寄生虫通常与定植有关,这导致宿主和寄生虫系统发育之间的不一致。为了检验这些不同的观点,阿德里安·帕特森,罗素·格雷和格雷厄姆·沃利斯得出了一个前伞状系统发育史。根据羽毛虱的关系,将这棵树与Timmermann树进行比较。蒂默曼的树更像是偶然发现的海鸟系统发育。因此,支持“比较寄生虫学”的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号