首页> 外文期刊>Surgical Endoscopy >Comparison between CO2 insufflation and abdominal wall lift in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective multiinstitutional study in Japan.
【24h】

Comparison between CO2 insufflation and abdominal wall lift in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective multiinstitutional study in Japan.

机译:腹腔镜胆囊切除术中CO2吹入与腹壁抬高的比较。日本的前瞻性多机构研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Abdominal wall lift (AWL) was developed mainly in Japan to avoid insufflation-related complications and to improve cost performance. AWL, however, has been criticized for its poor visibility in obese patients, the complexity of preparing the lifting instruments, and increased inflammatory reactions. As experience with AWL has increased, proponents of the procedure have come to believe that AWL is simple enough to qualify as a standard method of laparoscopic surgery even in obese patients. Postoperatively, issues such as pain, changes in body temperature, and time before returning to work do not appear to be much different from those after CO2 insufflation. METHODS: Twenty-three institutions participated in a prospective study to compare the effects of insufflation and AWL on surgical performance and postoperative course of laparoscopic surgery. Biochemical markers were also investigated including inflammatory responses. The patients were allocated to the participants to prevent experience-biases. A total of 144 patients were reviewed. RESULTS: Background factors such as male-female ratio, age and body-mass index were similar in each group. The incidence of conversion-to-open was not significantly different between insufflation and AWL. Preparation time and operating time were not significantly different, either. Serum CPK showed a significantly higher value one day after peritoneal lift than after subcutaneous lift. CPK level after insufflation was between that of peritoneal lift and after subcutaneous lift. Differences in changes of plasma interleukin 6 and other surgical stress markers were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study, although not randomized, suggests that, except for invasiveness to the muscular layers of the abdominal wall, there may be no substantial difference between AWL and insufflation or among subcutaneous lift, peritoneal lift or insufflation in terms of morbidity, mortality, preparation time, operating time, inflammatory reactions, and postoperative clinical course.
机译:背景:腹壁提升器(AWL)主要是在日本开发的,目的是避免与充气有关的并发症并提高成本效益。然而,AWL因其在肥胖患者中的可见度差,准备起重器械的复杂性以及炎症反应增加而受到批评。随着AWL经验的增加,该方法的支持者已经相信AWL非常简单,即使在肥胖患者中也足以作为腹腔镜手术的标准方法。术后,疼痛,体温变化和恢复工作之前的时间等问题似乎与二氧化碳注入后的问题没有太大不同。方法:二十三个机构参加了一项前瞻性研究,比较了吹气和AWL对手术性能和腹腔镜手术术后过程的影响。还研究了包括炎症反应在内的生化标志物。将患者分配给参与者以防止经历偏见。总共审查了144例患者。结果:每组的男女比例,年龄和体重指数等背景因素相似。注气和AWL之间转换为开放的发生率无显着差异。准备时间和操作时间也没有显着差异。腹膜提拉后一天的血清CPK值显着高于皮下提拉后。吹气后的CPK水平介于腹膜抬高和皮下抬高之间。没有观察到血浆白细胞介素6和其他手术应激标志物变化的差异。结论:这项前瞻性研究尽管不是随机的,但表明,除了对腹壁肌肉层的侵袭性外,AWL和吹入之间或皮下提拉,腹膜提拉或吹入之间在发病率,死亡率方面可能没有实质性差异。 ,准备时间,手术时间,炎症反应和术后临床过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号