首页> 外文期刊>Southern Journal of Applied Forestry >Midrotation Vegetation Control and Fertilization Response in Pinus taeda and Pinus elliottii across the Southeastern United States
【24h】

Midrotation Vegetation Control and Fertilization Response in Pinus taeda and Pinus elliottii across the Southeastern United States

机译:美国东南部taeda taeda和ellius elliottii的中转植被控制及施肥响应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We examined fertilization (224 and 56 kg ha(-1) of elemental nitrogen and phosphorus, applied as urea and diammonium phosphate, respectively) and vegetation control (one-time site-specific application) in a 2 x 2 factorial design with three or four replicates at each site on 13 sites (10 in Pinus taeda and 3 in Pinus elliottii). Nitrogen and phosphorus limited pine growth on seven sites where we found significant volume growth responses to fertilization in at least one measurement period. Five sites had significant volume growth responses to vegetation control in at least one measurement period. Biologic response treatment order was fertilizer plus vegetation control > fertilizer > vegetation control. The combined treatment effects were additive, indicating that resources other than nitrogen and phosphorus were being ameliorated by the vegetation control. Vegetation control response was not related to estimates of competing vegetation basal area, and its duration was likely limited by regrowth of competing vegetation on some sites. Competing vegetation leaf area was proposed as a good metric by which to estimate the extent of interference of noncrop vegetation. We recommend that future work examining vegetation control focus on a process approach to better understand the influences of competing vegetation on crop tree growth.
机译:我们以2 x 2阶乘设计(三个或三个)处理施肥(元素氮和磷分别为224和56 kg ha(-1),分别作为尿素和磷酸二铵施用)和植被控制(一次特定地点施用)。在13个位点的每个位点进行四个重复(taeda的10个和elliottii的3个)。氮和磷限制了七个地点的松树生长,在至少一个测量期内,我们发现其对施肥的明显体积增长反应。在至少一个测量期内,有五个地点对植被的控制具有明显的体积增长响应。生物响应处理顺序为肥料加植被控制>肥料>植被控制。综合处理效果是累加的,表明植被控制改善了氮和磷以外的资源。植被控制响应与竞争性植被基面积的估计值无关,其持续时间很可能受到某些地点竞争性植被的再生长的限制。竞争性植被叶面积被认为是评估非农作物植被受干扰程度的良好指标。我们建议未来的检查植被控制的工作应侧重于一种过程方法,以更好地理解竞争性植被对作物树木生长的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号