首页> 外文期刊>Southern Journal of Applied Forestry >High- Versus Low-Density LiDAR in a Double-Sample Forest Inventory
【24h】

High- Versus Low-Density LiDAR in a Double-Sample Forest Inventory

机译:双样本森林调查中的高密度低密度激光雷达

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data at 0.5- and 1-m postings were used in a double-sample forest inventory on Louisiana State University's Lee Experimental Forest, Louisiana. Phase 2 plots were established with DGPS. Tree dbh (>4.5 in.) and two sample heights (minimum and maximum dbh) were measured on every 10th plot of the phase 1 sample. Volume was computed for natural and planted pine and mixed hardwood species. LiDAR trees were selected with focal filter procedures and heights computed as the height difference between interpolated canopy and DEM surfaces. Dbh-height and ground-LiDAR height models were used to predict dbh from adjusted LiDAR height and compute ground and LiDAR estimates of ft basal area and ff~3 volume. Phase 1 LiDAR estimates were computed by randomly assigning heights to species classes using the probability distribution from ground plots in each inventory strata. Phase 2 LiDAR estimates were computed by randomly assigning heights to species-product groups using a Monte Carlo simulation for each ground plot. There was no statistical difference between highversus low-density LiDAR estimates on adjusted mean volume estimates (sampling errors of 8.16 versus 7.60% without height adjustment and 8.98 versus 8.63% with height adjustment). Low-density LiDAR surfaces without height adjustment produced the lowest sampling errors for stratified and nonstratified, double-sample volume estimates.
机译:在路易斯安那州立大学的李实验林(路易斯安那州)的双样本森林清单中使用了0.5米和1米时的光检测和测距(LiDAR)数据。使用DGPS建立了第二阶段的地块。在阶段1样本的每10个图上测量树dbh(> 4.5英寸)和两个样本高度(最小和最大dbh)。计算了天然和种植的松木和混合硬木树种的体积。选择LiDAR树并使用焦点滤镜程序,并将高度计算为插值冠层和DEM表面之间的高度差。使用Dbh高度和地面LiDAR高度模型根据调整后的LiDAR高度预测dbh,并计算ft和3体积的地面和LiDAR估计值。第一阶段的LiDAR估算值是通过使用每个清单层中地面图块的概率分布将高度随机分配给物种类别来计算的。通过对每个地面图进行蒙特卡洛模拟,通过将高度随机分配给物种-产品组来计算第二阶段的LiDAR估算值。经调整的平均体积估算值与低密度LiDAR估算值之间没有统计学差异(未经高度调整的采样误差为8.16对7.60%,经过高度调整的采样误差为8.98对8.63%)。未经分层调整的低密度LiDAR表面在分层和非分层的双样本体积估计中产生的采样误差最低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号