首页> 外文期刊>Sex roles >Addressing Conceptual Confusions About Evolutionary Theorizing: How and Why Evolutionary Psychology and Feminism Do Not Oppose Each Other
【24h】

Addressing Conceptual Confusions About Evolutionary Theorizing: How and Why Evolutionary Psychology and Feminism Do Not Oppose Each Other

机译:解决关于进化理论化的概念困惑:进化心理学和女性主义不反对的方式和方式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This commentary is a rejoinder to the Buss and Schmitt (2011) and Eagly and Wood (2011) commentaries concerning how evolutionary psychology and feminism might fit together. This rejoinder provides one path toward uniting these perspectives in psychological literature by accomplishing three tasks. First, this rejoinder addresses and removes conceptual confusions offered by Buss and Schmitt (2011) concerning the philosophy of science and psychology research. Second, this rejoinder fits evolutionary psychology perspectives into a correctly understood philosophy of science for psychology. Third, enacting Eagly and Wood's (2011) suggestions, this rejoinder connects evolutionary psychology and feminism by expanding Tate and Ledbetter's (2010) stepwise model for understanding the simultaneous contributions of evolutionary and developmental factors to psychological phenomena. Thus, by removing conceptual roadblocks, this rejoinder provides a scaffold for fruitful discussions concerning the interplay of evolutionary psychology and feminist perspectives when characterizing gender differences and similarities.
机译:该评论与Buss and Schmitt(2011)以及Eagly and Wood(2011)评论有关,它们涉及进化心理学和女权主义如何融合在一起。通过完成三个任务,这种重新结合为在心理学文献中统一这些观点提供了一条途径。首先,这种重新结合解决并消除了Buss和Schmitt(2011)在科学和心理学研究哲学上的概念混淆。其次,这种结合使进化心理学的观点适合被正确理解的心理学科学哲学。第三,结合Eagly和Wood(2011)的建议,通过扩展Tate和Ledbetter(2010)逐步模型来理解进化和发展因素对心理现象的同时贡献,这种重新结合将进化心理学和女权主义联系起来。因此,通过消除概念上的障碍,这种重新结合为表征性别差异和相似性时进化心理学和女权主义观点之间相互作用的研究提供了框架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号