首页> 外文期刊>Cerebrovascular diseases >Etiologic classification of TIA and minor stroke by A-S-C-O and causative classification system as compared to toast reduces the proportion of patients categorized as cause undetermined
【24h】

Etiologic classification of TIA and minor stroke by A-S-C-O and causative classification system as compared to toast reduces the proportion of patients categorized as cause undetermined

机译:通过A-S-C-O和病因分类系统对TIA和轻度卒中的病因学分类与吐司相比,减少了被归类为原因未定的患者的比例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The assortment of patients based on the underlying pathophysiology is central to preventing recurrent stroke after a transient ischemic attack and minor stroke (TIA-MS). The causative classification of stroke (CCS) and the A-S-C-O (A for atherosclerosis, S for small vessel disease, C for Cardiac source, O for other cause) classification schemes have recently been developed. These systems have not been specifically applied to the TIA-MS population. We hypothesized that both CCS and A-S-C-O would increase the proportion of patients with a definitive etiologic mechanism for TIA-MS as compared with TOAST.Methods: Patients were analyzed from the CATCH study. A single-stroke physician assigned all patients to an etiologic subtype using published algorithms for TOAST, CCS and ASCO. We compared the proportions in the various categories for each classification scheme and then the association with stroke progression or recurrence was assessed.Results: TOAST, CCS and A-S-C-O classification schemes were applied in 469 TIA-MS patients. When compared to TOAST both CCS (58.0 vs. 65.3%; p < 0.0001) and ASCO grade 1 or 2 (37.5 vs. 65.3%; p < 0.0001) assigned fewer patients as cause undetermined. CCS had increased assignment of cardioembolism (+3.8%, p = 0.0001) as compared with TOAST. ASCO grade 1 or 2 had increased assignment of cardioembolism (+8.5%, p < 0.0001), large artery atherosclerosis (+14.9%, p < 0.0001) and small artery occlusion (+4.3%, p < 0.0001) as compared with TOAST. Compared with CCS, using ASCO resulted in a 20.5% absolute reduction in patients assigned to the 'cause undetermined' category (p < 0.0001). Patients who had multiple high-risk etiologies either by CCS or ASCO classification or an ASCO undetermined classification had a higher chance of having a recurrent event.Conclusion: Both CCS and ASCO schemes reduce the proportion of TIA and minor stroke patients classified as 'cause undetermined.' ASCO resulted in the fewest patients classified as cause undetermined. Stroke recurrence after TIA-MS is highest in patients with multiple high-risk etiologies or cryptogenic stroke classified by ASCO.
机译:背景:根据潜在的病理生理学对患者进行分类对于预防短暂性脑缺血发作和轻度卒中(TIA-MS)后复发性卒中至关重要。中风的病因分类(CCS)和A-S-C-O(动脉粥样硬化的A,小血管疾病的S,心脏来源的C,其他原因的O)分类方案最近已经开发出来。这些系统尚未专门应用于TIA-MS人群。我们假设与TOAST相比,CCS和A-S-C-O均会增加具有明确病因机制的TIA-MS患者的比例。方法:从CATCH研究中分析患者。单冲程医师使用已发布的TOAST,CCS和ASCO算法将所有患者分配为病因亚型。我们比较了每种分类方案在各个类别中的比例,然后评估了与卒中进展或复发的相关性。结果:将TOAST,CCS和A-S-C-O分类方案应用于469名TIA-MS患者。与TOAST相比,CCS(58.0 vs. 65.3%; p <0.0001)和ASCO 1或2级(37.5 vs. 65.3%; p <0.0001)分配的病因较少的患者较少。与TOAST相比,CCS的心脏栓塞分配增加(+ 3.8%,p = 0.0001)。与TOAST相比,ASCO 1级或2级的心脏栓塞(+ 8.5%,p <0.0001),大动脉粥样硬化(+ 14.9%,p <0.0001)和小动脉闭塞(+ 4.3%,p <0.0001)的分配增加。与CCS相比,使用ASCO可使“原因未定”类别的患者绝对减少20.5%(p <0.0001)。通过CCS或ASCO分类或ASCO未定分类具有多种高危病因的患者发生复发事件的可能性更高。结论:CCS和ASCO方案均降低了TIA和被归为“原因未定”的轻度卒中患者的比例。” ASCO导致分类为原因不明的患者最少。在具有多种高危病因或ASCO分类的隐源性卒中的患者中,TIA-MS后卒中复发最高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号