首页> 外文期刊>Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries >Why are there no really big bony fishes? A point-of-view on maximum body size in teleosts and elasmobranchs
【24h】

Why are there no really big bony fishes? A point-of-view on maximum body size in teleosts and elasmobranchs

机译:为什么没有真正的大骨鱼?关于硬骨鱼和弹bra的最大体型的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The most massive teleost, the ocean sunfish (Mola mola), is an order of magnitude smaller than the largest cartilaginous fish, the whale shark (Rhincodon typus), and is significantly smaller than several other extant elasmobranch species. Possible reasons for this discrepancy in maximum size include: anatomical, physiological, ecological, and life-history/ontogenetic constraints. We examined life-history traits and growth rates as the most likely constraints on maximum teleost size. For pelagic fishes there appear to be two life-history strategies: producing few, large, live young or many, tiny eggs. We propose that this dichotomy is an evolutionary vestige of the freshwater origins of teleosts, and is the basis of the limitation on maximal body size in teleosts.
机译:最重的硬骨鱼类,即海洋翻车鱼(Mola mola),比最大的软骨鱼鲸鲨(Rhincodon typus)小一个数量级,并且比其他现存的弹性s小得多。最大大小差异的可能原因包括:解剖学,生理学,生态学和生活史/个体发育方面的限制。我们将生活史特征和增长率作为最大硬骨鱼类最可能的限制条件进行了研究。对于远洋鱼类,似乎有两种生活史策略:生产很少的,大的,活的幼鱼或许多微小的卵。我们建议这种二分法是硬骨鱼淡水起源的进化遗迹,并且是硬骨鱼最大体型限制的基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号