...
首页> 外文期刊>Land Use Policy >Assessing the suitability of soil and water conservation practices in Southwestern China.
【24h】

Assessing the suitability of soil and water conservation practices in Southwestern China.

机译:评估中国西南地区水土保持措施的适用性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The suitability of soil and water conservation (SWC) practices is the basis of their implementation, and determining their suitability is an important concern in the field of SWC studies. However, little research has been performed to assess the suitability of SWC approaches. In this study, we propose and demonstrate a method to assess the suitability of SWC practices and to assist decision makers in choosing the most appropriate SWC practices. Data from long-term research and community surveys in Linyuan village in Yanting County and Qunli village in Suining County, both in Southwestern China, were used to validate the method. The suitability of an SWC practice was defined as its objective adequacy under a particular set of natural and social conditions and the subjective satisfaction of local people with respect to their expectations and perceptions in a particular region and period. A dual-set paired-criterion system that examines input requirements and output expectations consisting of 'supply-requirement' and 'output-expectation' criteria was developed to evaluate the suitability of SWC approaches more thoroughly. An approach for assessing the suitability of SWC practices was also developed. This approach introduces membership functions and categorical values to address quantitative, qualitative and uncertain data and relies on ratio calculations of each set of paired assessment criteria. In this calculation, the numerical values of the 'supply-requirement' and 'output-expectation' ratios in the model were added together. When several SWC practices were compared, the highest value obtained by pairwise addition of these two criterion ratios indicated the most suitable practice. This approach was applied to compare the suitability of the following four practices in the two villages: terracing, contour tillage (CT), conversion to forestland (CFL) and conversion to grassland (CGL). The results indicated that terracing was the least suitable practice under local conditions, while CGL is the most suitable practice due to its highest economic efficiency. This conclusion reflects the reality that terraces have become more difficult to implement than in the past because of a shortage of labour and investment in the region. This result was consistent with those obtained using the general multiple-criteria analysis (MCA) method. Therefore, the new method proposed here is a highly effective and simple means of assessing the suitability of SWC practices in hilly areas of Southwestern China.
机译:水土保持实践的适用性是其实施的基础,而确定其适用性是SWC研究领域中的重要问题。但是,很少有研究评估SWC方法的适用性。在这项研究中,我们提出并演示了一种评估SWC做法的适用性并协助决策者选择最合适的SWC做法的方法。该方法来自西南地区盐亭县林园村和遂宁县群里村的长期研究和社区调查数据,用于验证该方法。 SWC做法的适用性被定义为在特定的自然和社会条件下的客观充分性,以及当地人对其在特定地区和时期内的期望和看法的主观满意度。开发了一套双重输入的成对标准系统,该系统检查由“供应需求”和“输出期望”标准组成的输入需求和输出期望,以更全面地评估SWC方法的适用性。还开发了一种评估SWC做法是否适用的方法。这种方法引入了隶属函数和分类值,以处理定量,定性和不确定的数据,并依赖于每组成对评估标准的比率计算。在此计算中,将模型中“供应需求”和“输出期望”比率的数值相加。当比较几种SWC做法时,通过成对相加这两个标准比率获得的最高值表明是最合适的做法。该方法用于比较以下两个村庄在以下两个村庄中的适用性:梯田,等高耕种(CT),退耕还林(CFL)和退耕还草(CGL)。结果表明,在当地条件下,梯田是最不适合的做法,而CGL由于具有最高的经济效率而最适合。该结论反映了这样一个现实:由于该地区劳动力和投资的短缺,梯田比过去更加难以实施。该结果与使用常规多标准分析(MCA)方法获得的结果一致。因此,这里提出的新方法是一种评估西南丘陵地区SWC措施适用性的高效简单的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号