首页> 外文期刊>Land Economics >Incentive Incompatibility and Starting-Point Bias in Iterative Valuation Questions: Reply
【24h】

Incentive Incompatibility and Starting-Point Bias in Iterative Valuation Questions: Reply

机译:迭代评估问题中的激励不相容和起点偏差:回复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aadland and Caplan (2004) point out an inconsistency in the model in Whitehead (2002). Specifically, the model suffers from (1) an incorrect interpretation of the shift coefficient, and (2) omitted variables when covariates are included. This leads to incorrect formulas for measurement of the willingness-to-pay values in equations and (Whitehead 2002, 289). I agree with their comments and take this opportunity to present a revised model inspired by Aadland and Caplan.
机译:Aadland和Caplan(2004)在Whitehead(2002)中指出了该模型的不一致之处。具体而言,该模型的缺点是:(1)对移位系数的解释不正确,以及(2)当包含协变量时,省略了变量。这就导致了用不正确的公式来计算支付意愿值的公式(Whitehead 2002,289)。我同意他们的意见,并借此机会介绍受Aadland和Caplan启发的修订模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号