首页> 外文期刊>Nursing inquiry >The ethical tightrope: politics of intimacy and consensual method in sexuality research
【24h】

The ethical tightrope: politics of intimacy and consensual method in sexuality research

机译:道德走钢丝:性研究中的亲密政治和自愿方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper seeks to analyze the construction of ethics in sexuality research in which qualitative methods are employed in the field of social sciences. Analyses are based on a bibliographic review of current discussions on research methods of queer theory and on the authors' own experiences of past research on sexuality. The article offers a theoretical perspective on the ways ethnography and in-depth interviews become methods that can rely on a consensual method and create a politics of intimacy between the researchers and research participants. The politics of intimacy may contribute to the production of a politically engaged knowledge while escaping from the moral matrix that usually governs the relationship between researchers and research participants. It is argued here that the researcher's sexed and gendered body matters for fieldwork; that the consensual method among participants may be employed in sexuality research as a fruitful tool; and that the relationships created among researchers and participants can pose a challenge to predetermined ethical guidelines in research. As a result, discussions problematize the existence of a politics of intimacy in sexuality research that is characterized by ethical relations among research participants.
机译:本文旨在分析性研究中的伦理学建构,其中在社会科学领域采用了定性方法。分析基于对同志理论研究方法的当前讨论的书目综述,以及作者对性研究的以往经验。本文就人种学和深度访谈成为可以依靠共识方法并在研究人员和研究参与者之间建立亲密关系的方法提供了一种理论视角。亲密关系的政治可能有助于产生政治参与的知识,同时逃脱通常支配研究人员和研究参与者之间关系的道德矩阵。有人认为研究人员的性别和性别对田野调查很重要。参与者之间的自愿方法可以作为性研究的有益工具;研究人员和参与者之间建立的关系可能会对预先确定的研究道德准则构成挑战。结果,讨论使性研究中存在一种以研究参与者之间的伦理关系为特征的亲密政治成为问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号