...
首页> 外文期刊>Catena: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Soil Science Hydrology-Geomorphology Focusing on Geoecology and Landscape Evolution >A novel ensemble bivariate statistical evidential belief function with knowledge-based analytical hierarchy process and multivariate statistical logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping.
【24h】

A novel ensemble bivariate statistical evidential belief function with knowledge-based analytical hierarchy process and multivariate statistical logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping.

机译:一种新颖的整体二元统计证据置信函数,具有基于知识的层次分析法和多元统计逻辑回归,用于滑坡敏感性测绘。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study compares the landslide susceptibility maps from four application models, namely, (1) the bivariate model of the Dempster-Shafer based evidential belief function (EBF); (2) integration of the EBF in the knowledge-based analytical hierarchy process (AHP) as a pairwise comparison model processed by using all available causative factors; (3) integration of the EBF in the knowledge-based AHP as a pairwise comparison model by using high nominated causative factor weights only; and (4) integrated EBF in the logistic regression (LR) as a multivariate model by using nominated causative factor weights only. These models were tested in Pohang and Gyeongju Cities (South Korea) by using the geographic information system GIS platform. In the first step, a landslide inventory map consisting of 296 landslide locations were prepared from various data sources. Then, a total of 15 landslide causative factors (slope angle, slope aspect, curvature, surface roughness, altitude, distance from drainages, stream power index, topographic wetness index, wood age, wood diameter, wood type, forest density, soil thickness, soil texture, and soil drainage) were extracted from the database and then converted into a raster. Final susceptibility maps exhibit close results from the two models. Models 1 and 3 predicted 82.3% and 80% of testing data during the analysis, respectively. Thus, Models 1 and 3 show better performance than LR. These resultant maps can be used to extend the capability of bivariate statistical based model, by finding the relationship between each single conditioning factor and landslide locations, moreover, the proposed ensemble model can be used to show the inter-relationships importance between each conditioning factors, without the need to refer to the multivariate statistic. The research outcome may provide powerful tools for natural hazard assessment and land use planning.
机译:这项研究比较了来自四个应用模型的滑坡敏感性图,即:(1)基于证据信念函数(EBF)的Dempster-Shafer的双变量模型; (2)将EBF集成为基于知识的层次分析法(AHP),并使用所有可能的致病因素进行成对比较模型; (3)仅使用高提名的致病因素权重将基于知识的层次分析法中的EBF集成为成对比较模型; (4)仅使用提名的致病因素权重将EBF集成到logistic回归(LR)中作为多变量模型。通过使用地理信息系统GIS平台,在浦项市和庆州市(韩国)对这些模型进行了测试。第一步,从各种数据源准备了包括296个滑坡位置的滑坡清单图。然后,得出总共15个滑坡成因(坡度角,坡向,曲率,表面粗糙度,海拔高度,距排水装置的距离,水流功率指数,地形湿度指数,木龄,木径,木材类型,森林密度,土壤厚度,土壤质地和土壤排水)从数据库中提取,然后转换为栅格。最终磁化率图显示了两个模型的接近结果。模型1和模型3分别预测了分析期间测试数据的82.3%和80%。因此,模型1和模型3显示出比LR更好的性能。这些结果图可用于扩展基于双变量统计的模型的能力,通过找到每个单个调节因子与滑坡位置之间的关系,此外,所提出的集成模型可用于显示每个调节因子之间的相互关系重要性,无需参考多元统计量。研究结果可能为自然灾害评估和土地利用规划提供强大的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号