首页> 外文期刊>Neurosurgery >Biomechanical comparison of four C1 to C2 rigid fixative techniques: anterior transarticular, posterior transarticular, C1 to C2 pedicle, and C1 to C2 intralaminar screws.
【24h】

Biomechanical comparison of four C1 to C2 rigid fixative techniques: anterior transarticular, posterior transarticular, C1 to C2 pedicle, and C1 to C2 intralaminar screws.

机译:四种C1至C2刚性固定技术的生物力学比较:前经关节,后经关节,C1至C2椎弓根和C1至C2椎弓根螺钉。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: We performed a biomechanical comparison of several C1 to C2 fixation techniques including crossed laminar (intralaminar) screw fixation, anterior C1 to C2 transarticular screw fixation, C1 to 2 pedicle screw fixation, and posterior C1 to C2 transarticular screw fixation. METHODS: Eight cadaveric cervical spines were tested intact and after dens fracture. Four different C1 to C2 screw fixation techniques were tested. Posterior transarticular and pedicle screw constructs were tested twice, once with supplemental sublaminar cables and once without cables. The specimens were tested in three modes of loading: flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. All tests were performed in load and torque control. Pure bending moments of 2 nm were applied in flexion-extension and lateral bending, whereas a 1 nm moment was applied in axial rotation. Linear displacements were recorded from extensometers rigidly affixed to the C1 and C2 vertebrae. Linear displacements were reduced to angular displacements using trigonometry. RESULTS: Adding cable fixation results in a stiffer construct for posterior transarticular screws. The addition of cables did not affect the stiffness of C1 to C2 pedicle screw constructs. There were no significant differences in stiffness between anterior and posterior transarticular screw techniques, unless cable fixation was added to the posterior construct. All three posterior screw constructs with supplemental cable fixation provide equal stiffness with regard to flexion-extension and axial rotation. C1 lateral mass-C2 intralaminar screw fixation restored resistance to lateral bending but not to the same degree as the other screw fixation techniques. CONCLUSION: All four screw fixation techniques limit motion at the C1 to 2 articulation. The addition of cable fixation improves resistance to flexion and extension for posterior transarticular screw fixation.
机译:目的:我们对几种C1至C2固定技术进行了生物力学比较,包括交叉层板(椎间内)螺钉固定,前C1至C2椎弓根螺钉固定,C1至2椎弓根螺钉固定以及后C1至C2椎弓根螺钉固定。方法:对8具尸体颈椎进行完整测试,并在牙窝骨折后进行测试。测试了四种不同的C1至C2螺钉固定技术。对后关节和椎弓根螺钉构造进行了两次测试,一次使用辅助层下电缆,一次不使用电缆。以三种加载方式测试了样品:弯曲-拉伸,横向弯曲和轴向旋转。所有测试均在负载和扭矩控制下进行。在弯曲延伸和横向弯曲中施加2 nm的纯弯矩,而在轴向旋转中施加1 nm的纯弯矩。从固定在C1和C2椎骨上的引伸计记录线性位移。使用三角学将线性位移减小为角位移。结果:增加电缆固定可以使后关节螺钉的结构更加坚固。电缆的添加不会影响C1到C2椎弓根螺钉结构的刚度。除非经后路固定装置添加电缆固定,否则前,后关节螺钉技术之间的刚度没有显着差异。所有三种带有辅助电缆固定的后螺钉构造在屈伸和轴向旋转方面均提供相同的刚度。 C1侧块-C2椎板内螺钉固定恢复了对侧向弯曲的抵抗力,但程度与其他螺钉固定技术不同。结论:所有四种螺钉固定技术均限制了C1至2关节的运动。电缆固定的增加提高了对后经关节螺钉固定的屈曲和伸展的抵抗力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号