首页> 外文期刊>Neuropsychologia >What gets the attention of the temporo-parietal junction? An fMRI investigation of attention and theory of mind.
【24h】

What gets the attention of the temporo-parietal junction? An fMRI investigation of attention and theory of mind.

机译:什么引起了颞顶交界的注意? fMRI对注意力和心理理论的研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have demonstrated a critical role for a cortical region in the right temporo-parietal junction (RTPJ) in theory of mind has been implicated in the deployment of attention to an unexpected stimulus. One hypothesis ("attention hypothesis") is that patterns of RTPJ activation in ToM tasks can be fully explained by appeal to attention: stimuli that apparently manipulate aspects of ToM are in fact manipulating aspects of attention. On an alternative hypothesis ("ToM hypothesis"), functional regions identified by ToM tasks are selective for ToM, and not just for any unexpected stimulus. Here, we used fMRI to test these competing hypotheses: are brain regions implicated in ToM, including the RTPJ, LTPJ, and precuneus, recruited specifically for mental states, or for any unexpected stimulus? We first identified brain regions implicated in ToM, using a standard paradigm: participants read stories about false beliefs and false physical representations (e.g., outdated photographs). Participants also read a new set of stories describing mental or physical states, which were unexpected or expected. Regions of interest analyses revealed a higher response in the RTPJ, LTPJ, and precuneus, for mental versus physical stories, but no difference for unexpected and expected stories. Whole-brain random effects analyses also revealed higher activation in these regions for mental versus physical stories. This pattern provides evidence for the ToM hypothesis: the response in these functional regions is selective for mental state content, whether that content is unexpected or expected.
机译:功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究已证明,在右侧颞颞顶交界处(RTPJ)的皮质区域中,至关重要的作用是心理理论,涉及对意料之外的刺激的注意。一种假设(“注意假设”)是ToM任务中RTPJ激活的模式可以通过吸引注意力来完全解释:显然操纵ToM方面的刺激实际上是在操纵注意力。在另一种假设(“ ToM假设”)上,由ToM任务标识的功能区域对ToM具有选择性,而不仅仅是对任何意外的刺激。在这里,我们使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)测试了这些相互竞争的假设:ToM是否牵涉到大脑区域,包括RTPJ,LTPJ和早产儿,是专门为精神状态或任何意外刺激而招募的?我们首先使用标准范例来识别与ToM相关的大脑区域:参与者阅读有关错误信念和错误身体表征的故事(例如过时的照片)。参与者还阅读了一组新的故事,描述了意料之外或预期的精神或身体状态。感兴趣的区域分析显示,RTPJ,LTPJ和前胎对心理故事和身体故事的响应较高,但对于意外和预期的故事则没有差异。全脑随机效应分析还显示,这些区域的心理故事和身体故事的激活程度更高。这种模式为ToM假设提供了证据:这些功能区域中的响应对于心理状态内容具有选择性,无论该内容是意外的还是预期的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号