AimTo comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of tetracaine eye drops as a local anesthetic agent among pediatric patients undergoing for strabismus surgery.MethodsWe systemically searched four electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) from inception until April 2023. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing tetracaine and placebo or no intervention for intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in strabismus surgery patients. We used the Cochrane risk of bias-2 tool for the risk of bias assessment. Continuous variables were pooled as mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD), and categorical variables were pooled as risk ratio (RR) with a 95 confidence interval (CI).ResultsSix RCTs were included in the meta-analysis, with a total of 326 patients. There was no significant difference between the tetracaine and the control groups regarding the mean operative time (MD = -0.10 minutes, 95 CI -3.79, 3.59, p = .96), the mean time to first analgesia (MD = -0.87 minutes, 95 CI -11.15, 9.40, P = .87), the mean behavior score (SMD = -S0.48, 95 CI -1.24, 0.28, p = .22), the rate of postoperative vomiting (RR = 1.27, 95 CI 0.62, 2.61, p = .52), or the number of additional analgesia (RR = 0.55, 95 CI 0.27, 1.13, p = .10).ConclusionOur systematic review and meta-analysis found no significant differences in the safety and efficacy of tetracaine eye drops for strabismus surgery when compared to placebo or no intervention. Further investigation is needed to establish the best local anesthetic for strabismus surgery.
展开▼
