...
首页> 外文期刊>Nature Communications >Humans and chimpanzees attend differentlyto goal-directed actions
【24h】

Humans and chimpanzees attend differentlyto goal-directed actions

机译:人类和黑猩猩以不同方式参与目标导向的行动

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Humans comprehend the actions of others by making inferences about intentional mentalstates of another. However, little is known about how this capacity develops and whether thisis shared with other animals. Here we show the ontogenetic and evolutionary foundations ofthis ability by comparing the eye movements of 8- and 12-month-old human infants, adults andchimpanzees as they watched videos presenting goal-directed and non-goal-directed actionsby an actor. We find that chimpanzees anticipate action goals in the same way as do humanadults. Humans and chimpanzees, however, scan goal-directed actions differently. Humans,particularly infants, refer to actors’ faces significantly more than do chimpanzees. In humanadults, attentional allocation to an actor’s face changes as the goal-directed actions proceed.In the case of non-goal-directed actions, human adults attend less often to faces relative togoal-directed actions. These findings indicate that humans have a predisposition to observegoal-directed actions by integrating information from the actor.
机译:人类通过推断他人的故意心理状态来理解他人的行为。然而,人们对这种能力如何发展以及是否与其他动物共享知之甚少。在这里,我们通过比较8个月和12个月大的人类婴儿,成人和黑猩猩在观看视频中展示演员的目标定向和非目标定向动作时的眼球运动,来显示此能力的本体论和进化基础。我们发现黑猩猩以与人类成年相同的方式预期行动目标。然而,人类和黑猩猩对目标指向的行为的扫描方式有所不同。与黑猩猩相比,人类(尤其是婴儿)所指的是演员的面孔。在成年人中,随着目标定向动作的进行,对演员脸部的注意力分配会发生变化。在非目标定向的情况下,成年人相对于目标定向的行为较少地参与。这些发现表明,人类倾向于通过整合参与者的信息来观察目标导向的行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号