首页> 外文期刊>Medical education >Analysis of verbal interactions in tutorial groups: a process study.
【24h】

Analysis of verbal interactions in tutorial groups: a process study.

机译:辅导小组中语言互动的分析:过程研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction Collaborative learning, including problem-based learning (PBL), is a powerful learning method. Group interaction plays a crucial role in stimulating student learning. However, few studies on learning processes in medical education have examined group interactions. Most studies on collaboration within PBL used self-reported data rather than observational data. We investigated the following types of interactions in PBL tutorial groups: learning-oriented interactions (exploratory questioning, cumulative reasoning and handling conflicts about knowledge); procedural interactions, and irrelevant/off-task interactions. Aim The central question concerned how much time is spent on the different types of interaction during group sessions and how the types of interaction are distributed over the meeting. Method Four tutorial group sessions in Year 2 of the PBL undergraduate curriculum of Maastricht Medical School were videotaped and analysed. The sessions concerned the reporting phase of the PBL process. We analysed the interactions using a coding scheme distinguishing several verbal interaction types, such as questions, arguments and evaluations. Results Learning-orientated interactions accounted for 80% of the interactions, with cumulative reasoning, exploratory questioning and handling conflicts about knowledge accounting for about 63%, 10% and 7% of the interactions, respectively. Exploratory questioning often preceded cumulative reasoning. Both types occurred throughout the meeting. Handling conflicts mainly occurred after the first 20 minutes. Conclusions Task involvement in the tutorial groups was high. All types of learning-orientated interactions were observed. Relatively little time was spent on exploratory questions and handling conflicts about knowledge. Problem-based learning training should pay special attention to stimulating discussion about contradictory information.
机译:简介协作学习,包括基于问题的学习(PBL),是一种强大的学习方法。小组互动在激发学生学习方面起着至关重要的作用。但是,很少有关于医学教育学习过程的研究来探讨小组互动。关于PBL内部合作的大多数研究都使用自我报告的数据,而不是观察数据。我们在PBL教程组中研究了以下类型的交互:面向学习的交互(探索性提问,累积推理和处理有关知识的冲突);过程上的互动,以及无关紧要的任务外互动。目的中心问题涉及在小组会议期间在不同类型的互动上花费了多少时间,以及互动类型在会议中的分布方式。方法对马斯特里赫特医学院PBL本科课程第二年的四个辅导小组会议进行录像和分析。这些会议涉及PBL过程的报告阶段。我们使用一种区分几种语言交互类型(例如问题,论据和评估)的编码方案来分析交互。结果以学习为导向的互动占互动的80%,累积推理,探索性提问和处理知识冲突分别占互动的63%,10%和7%。探索性提问通常先于累积性推理。两种类型都在整个会议期间发生。处理冲突主要发生在最初的20分钟之后。结论教程小组中的任务投入很高。观察到所有类型的以学习为导向的互动。在探索性问题和处理有关知识的冲突上花费的时间相对较少。基于问题的学习培训应特别注意激发有关矛盾信息的讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号