首页> 外文期刊>Medical decision making: An international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making >The Impact of Numeracy on Verbatim Knowledge of the Longitudinal Risk for Prostate Cancer Recurrence following Radiation Therapy
【24h】

The Impact of Numeracy on Verbatim Knowledge of the Longitudinal Risk for Prostate Cancer Recurrence following Radiation Therapy

机译:精确度对放射疗法后前列腺癌复发纵向风险的逐字认识的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective. Given the long natural history of prostate cancer, we assessed differing graphical formats for imparting knowledge about the longitudinal risks of prostate cancer recurrence with or without hormone' or androgen deprivation' therapy. Methods. Male volunteers without a history of prostate cancer were randomized to 1 of 8 risk communication instruments that depicted the likelihood of prostate cancer returning or spreading over 1, 2, and 3 years. The tools differed in format (line, pie, bar, or pictograph) and whether the graph also included no numbers, 1 number (indicating the number of affected individuals), or 2 numbers (indicting both the number affected and the number unaffected). The main outcome variables evaluated were graphical preference and knowledge. Results. A total of 420 men were recruited; respondents were least familiar and experienced with pictographs (P < 0.0001), and only 10% preferred this particular format. Overall accuracy ranged from 79% to 92%, and when assessed across all graphical subtypes, the addition of numerical information did not improve verbatim knowledge (P = 0.1). Self-reported numeracy was a strong predictor of accuracy of responses (odds ratio [OR] = 2.6, P = 0.008), and the impact of high numeracy varied across graphical type, having a greater impact on line (OR = 5.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.6-16; P = 0.04) and pie charts (OR = 7.1; 95% CI = 2.6-19; P =0.01), without an impact on pictographs (OR = 0.4; 95% CI = 0.1-1.7; P = 0.17) or bar charts (OR = 0.5; 95% CI = 0.1-1.8; P = 0.24). Conclusion. For longitudinal presentation of risk, baseline numeracy was strongly prognostic for outcome. However, the addition of numbers to risk graphs improved only the delivery of verbatim knowledge for subjects with lower numeracy. Although subjects reported the least familiarity with pictographs, they were one of the most effective means of transferring information regardless of numeracy.
机译:目的。考虑到前列腺癌的悠久自然历史,我们评估了不同的图形格式,以提供有关使用或不使用激素或雄激素剥夺治疗的前列腺癌复发纵向风险的知识。方法。没有前列腺癌病史的男性志愿者被随机分配到8种风险交流工具中的1种,这些工具描述了前列腺癌在1、2和3年内复发或扩散的可能性。这些工具的格式(线,饼图,条形图或象形图)不同,并且图形是否还不包括数字,1个数字(表示受影响的个人数量)或2个数字(表示受影响的数量和不受影响的数量)。评估的主要结果变量是图形偏好和知识。结果。总共招募了420名男子;受访者对象形文字的了解最少,经验最少(P <0.0001),只有10%的人喜欢这种特殊格式。总体准确度从79%到92%不等,当对所有图形亚型进行评估时,添加数字信息并不能改善逐字记录知识(P = 0.1)。自我报告的计算能力是预测准确性的重要指标(优势比[OR] = 2.6,P = 0.008),高计算能力的影响因图形类型而异,对线路的影响更大(OR = 5.1; 95%置信区间[CI] = 1.6-16; P = 0.04)和饼图(OR = 7.1; 95%CI = 2.6-19; P = 0.01),而对象形文字没有影响(OR = 0.4; 95%CI = 0.1 -1.7; P = 0.17)或条形图(OR = 0.5; 95%CI = 0.1-1.8; P = 0.24)。结论。对于风险的纵向表现,基线计算对结局有很强的预后。但是,将数字添加到风险图中只会改善对算术较低的受试者的逐字记录知识的传递。尽管受试者报告对象形文字的了解最少,但不管算术如何,它们都是传递信息的最有效手段之一。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号