首页> 外文期刊>Canadian journal of gastroenterology >A randomized trial of topical anesthesia comparing lidocaine versus lidocaine plus xylometazoline for unsedated transnasal upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
【24h】

A randomized trial of topical anesthesia comparing lidocaine versus lidocaine plus xylometazoline for unsedated transnasal upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

机译:比较利多卡因与利多卡因加木糖咪唑啉用于未镇静的经鼻上消化道内窥镜检查的局部麻醉随机试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The optimal topical anesthesia regimen for unsedated transnasal endoscopy is unknown. The addition of a nasal decongestant, such as xylometazoline (X), to a topical anesthestic may improve patient comfort. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of lidocaine (L) versus L plus X (LX) for anesthesia in unsedated transnasal endoscopy. METHODS: Consecutive participants of the Aklavik Helicobacter pylori project were prospectively randomly assigned to receive LX or L for unsedated transnasal 4.9 mm ultrathin endoscopy. The primary outcome was overall procedure discomfort on a validated 10-point visual analogue scale (1 = no discomfort, 10 = severe discomfort). Secondary outcomes included pain, endoscope insertion difficulty, gagging, adverse events and encounter times. Results were presented as mean +/- SD, difference in mean, 95% CI. RESULTS: A total of 181 patients were randomly assigned to receive LX (n=94) and L (n=87). Baseline characteristics between the two groups were similar (mean age 40 years, 59% women). Overall, patient procedural discomfort with LX and L were 4.2+/-2.4 versus 3.9+/-2.1, respectively (0.29; 95% CI -0.39 to 0.96). Transnasal insertion difficulty was significantly lower with LX than with L (2.4+/-2.1 versus 3.2+/-2.8, respectively [-0.80; 95% CI -1.54 to -0.06]). Compared with L, the use of LX was associated with significantly less time needed to apply anesthesia (2.4+/-1.8 min versus 3.5+/-2.2 min, respectively [-1.10; 95% CI -1.71 min to -0.50 min]) and less time for insertion (3.2+/-1.8 min versus 3.9+/-2.2 min, respectively [-0.70 min; 95% CI -1.30 min to -0.10 min]). Epistaxis was rare but occurred less frequently with LX (1.1%) than with L (4.6%) (P=0.19). CONCLUSIONS: LX did not improve patient comfort for transnasal endoscopy compared with L alone. However, LX was associated with less difficulty with endoscope transnasal insertion and reduced insertion time. Further studies on the optimal regimen and dosing of anesthesia are required.
机译:背景:未镇静的经鼻内窥镜检查的最佳局部麻醉方案尚不清楚。在局部麻醉剂中添加鼻减充血剂(如xylometazoline(X))可以改善患者的舒适度。目的:确定利多卡因(L)与L加X(LX)在未镇静的经鼻内窥镜检查中麻醉的有效性。方法:前瞻性地将连续参加阿克拉维克幽门螺杆菌项目的参与者随机分配接受LX或L,用于未经镇静的经鼻4.9毫米超薄内镜检查。主要结局是在经过验证的10点视觉模拟量表上的总体手术不适感(1 =无不适感,10 =严重不适感)。次要结果包括疼痛,内窥镜插入困难,堵嘴,不良事件和接触时间。结果表示为平均值+/- SD,平均值差异,95%CI。结果:总共181例患者被随机分配接受LX(n = 94)和L(n = 87)。两组之间的基线特征相似(平均年龄40岁,女性59%)。总体而言,患者对LX和L的手术不适感分别为4.2 +/- 2.4对3.9 +/- 2.1(0.29; 95%CI -0.39至0.96)。 LX的经鼻插入难度显着低于L(分别为2.4 +/- 2.1与3.2 +/- 2.8 [-0.80; 95%CI -1.54至-0.06])。与L相比,使用LX所需的麻醉时间明显更少(分别为2.4 +/- 1.8分钟和3.5 +/- 2.2分钟[-1.10; 95%CI -1.71分钟至-0.50分钟])和更少的插入时间(分别为3.2 +/- 1.8分钟和3.9 +/- 2.2分钟[-0.70分钟; 95%CI -1.30分钟至-0.10分钟])。鼻出血很少见,但LX(1.1%)的发生率低于L(4.6%)(P = 0.19)。结论:与单独使用L相比,LX不能改善经鼻内窥镜检查的患者舒适度。但是,LX与内窥镜经鼻插入的难度较小,插入时间缩短了。需要对最佳治疗方案和麻醉剂量进行进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号