【24h】

Twin paradox and the logical foundation of relativity theory

机译:孪生悖论与相对论的逻辑基础

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We study the foundation of space-time theory in the framework of first-order logic (FOL). Since the foundation of mathematics has been successfully carried through (via set theory) in FOL, it is not entirely impossible to do the same for space-time theory (or relativity). First we recall a simple and streamlined FOL-axiomatization Specrel of special relativity from the literature. Specrel is complete with respect to questions about inertial motion. Then we ask ourselves whether we can prove the usual relativistic properties of accelerated motion (e.g., clocks in acceleration) in Specrel. As it turns out, this is practically equivalent to asking whether Specrel is strong enough to "handle" (or treat) accelerated observers. We show that there is a mathematical principle called induction (IND) coming from real analysis which needs to be added to Specrel in order to handle situations involving relativistic acceleration. We present an extended version AccRel of Specrel which is strong enough to handle accelerated motion, in particular, accelerated observers. Among others, we show that the Twin Paradox becomes provable in AccRel, but it is not provable without IND.
机译:我们在一阶逻辑(FOL)框架中研究时空理论的基础。由于FOL已成功地(通过集合论)贯彻了数学基础,因此对时空理论(或相对论)做同样的事情并非完全不可能。首先,我们从文献中回顾出一个简单而精简的具有相对论性的FOL-公理化规范。关于惯性运动的问题,Specrel是完整的。然后,我们问自己是否可以证明Specrel中加速运动的通常相对论性质(例如,加速中的时钟)。事实证明,这实际上等同于询问Specrel是否足够强大以“处理”(或处理)加速的观察者。我们证明,有一个称为归纳(IND)的数学原理来自实际分析,需要将其添加到Specrel中才能处理涉及相对论加速的情况。我们提出了Specrel的扩展版本AccRel,它的强度足以应付加速运动,特别是加速观察者。除其他外,我们证明了Twin Paradox在AccRel中成为可证明的,但是没有IND则无法证明。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号