...
首页> 外文期刊>Geographical Journal >Cooperation at different scales: challenges for local and international water resource governance in South Africa
【24h】

Cooperation at different scales: challenges for local and international water resource governance in South Africa

机译:不同规模的合作:南非本地和国际水资源治理的挑战

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Theory on environmental governance and water governance emphasises decentralised,devolved forms of interaction between stakeholders. As previously excluded actors are empowered to take part in governance, new forms of cooperation are created. This paper examines how the cooperative principle has influenced stakeholder interaction at the local and international scales of water governance in South Africa. Water policies and initiatives have been set up to promote multi-level governance that emphasises cooperation between various stakeholders. The emphasis on cooperation and inclusiveness is particularly pertinent to the South African context because of its apartheid past. The paper asks whether there have been new forms of cooperation between a wider array of actors, as the theory proposes.By using the case studies of the Sabie catchment and the Lesotho Highlands Water Project to examine local and international level governance, the paper finds challenges related to power disparity and interdependence of actors, and risk perceptions of inclusive decisionmaking.It is found that at both the local and international level, the state, which is a ‘traditional’ actor, still plays an influential role in decision-making. ‘New’ actors such as businesses, civil society, and regional institutions are more visible but have limited decision-making power. Non-linear, time-consuming forms of cooperation occur in water governance.
机译:关于环境治理和水治理的理论强调利益相关者之间的分散,分散的互动形式。由于先前被排除在外的行为者有权参与治理,因此创建了新的合作形式。本文探讨了合作原则如何在南非水治理的本地和国际范围内影响利益相关者的互动。已经制定了水政策和倡议,以促进强调各个利益相关者之间合作的多层次治理。由于种族隔离的过去,对合作与包容性的强调与南非的情况特别相关。如理论所提出的那样,本文询问了广泛参与者之间是否存在新的合作形式。通过对萨比流域和莱索托高地水利项目的案例研究来研究地方和国际层面的治理,本文发现了挑战与行为者的权力悬殊和相互依存以及包容性决策的风险感知有关。发现在国家和国际层面上,作为``传统''行为者的国家仍然在决策中发挥着重要作用。商业,公民社会和区域机构等“新”参与者更为明显,但决策权有限。水资源管理中存在非线性,耗时的合作形式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号