...
首页> 外文期刊>European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology: Official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) >Postoperative application of amphotericin B nasal spray in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis, with a review of the antifungal therapy.
【24h】

Postoperative application of amphotericin B nasal spray in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis, with a review of the antifungal therapy.

机译:两性霉素B鼻喷雾剂在慢性鼻-鼻窦炎合并鼻息肉的术后应用,并对其抗真菌治疗进行了综述。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) affects 1-4% of the adult population. The etiology of this multifactorial, chronic disease, which leads to a significant impairment of the quality of life, often accompanied by nasal polyposis, is not fully understood. In the past decade, it was presumed that the disease, which causes characteristic eosinophilic infiltration of the nasal mucosa, is triggered by an enhanced (but not classical allergic IgE-type) immune response against fungal organisms in the nasal mucus. If this supposition is correct, then it appears obvious that the administration of amphotericin B nasal spray in adequate concentration following endoscopic polypectomy should be advantageous for these patients, and might even reduce the number of recurrent cases. To check on this assumption, we conducted a prospective randomized placebo-controlled trial involving 33 patients, 30 of whom remained in the study throughout. Patients with nasal polyposis were operated on with an endoscopic technique between 1 November 2005 and 1 October 2006; group A (14 randomly selected patients) were treated with a nasal spray containing 5 mg/ml amphotericin B, while the placebo group B (16 randomly selected patients) received a nasal spray lacking amphotericin B. We evaluated our results with the aid of a modified Lund-Mackay CT score, the SNAQ-11 test (which assesses changes in the symptoms), a quality of life test and endoscopy. The SPSS 14.0 for Windows program was utilized to process the data of examinations performed preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. The CT scores of the group A patients 1 year after the operation exhibited wide scattering, without signs of recovery. The CT scores of the group B patients indicated a slight improvement, though this did not prove significant relative to group A. Both the SNAQ-11 test and the quality of life test revealed a significant improvement in each group, but the degrees of change in these tests did not differ significantly between the two groups of patients. The endoscopic findings indicated a slight improvement to the advantage of the amphotericin B-treated group 12 months after the operation. These results lead to the conclusion that the administration of amphotericin B nasal spray to patients operated on for nasal polyposis does not give rise to a significant alteration in either CT score, clinical symptoms, or quality of life. The more favorable clinical aspects observed in the amphotericin B-treated group during the endoscopic follow-up did not correspond to an improvement in the symptoms. In connection with the conclusions drawn from this study, the authors discuss the controversial data available on the fungal etiology of CRS. They critically analyze the contradictory observations and conclusions of seven recent clinical studies.
机译:慢性鼻-鼻窦炎(CRS)影响1-4%的成年人口。这种多因素的慢性疾病的病因学导致生命质量的显着降低,通常伴随着鼻息肉,目前尚未完全了解。在过去的十年中,据推测该疾病引起鼻粘膜嗜酸性粒细胞浸润,是由增强的(但不是经典的过敏性IgE型)针对鼻粘液中真菌的免疫反应触发的。如果这种假设是正确的,那么很明显的是,在内窥镜息肉切除术后给予足够浓度的两性霉素B鼻喷剂对这些患者有利,甚至可以减少复发病例的数量。为了验证这一假设,我们进行了一项前瞻性随机安慰剂对照试验,涉及33位患者,其中30位仍在研究中。鼻息肉病患者在2005年11月1日至2006年10月1日期间使用内窥镜技术进行手术; A组(随机选择的14例患者)接受了含5 mg / ml两性霉素B的鼻喷剂治疗,而安慰剂B组(随机选择的16例患者)接受了缺乏两性霉素B的鼻腔喷剂。修改后的Lund-Mackay CT评分,SNAQ-11测试(评估症状的变化),生活质量测试和内窥镜检查。 Windows程序SPSS 14.0用于处理术前和术后1年的检查数据。术后1年,A组患者的CT评分表现出广泛的散乱,没有恢复的迹象。 B组患者的CT评分显示有轻微改善,尽管相对于A组而言并未证明显着改善。SNAQ-11测试和生活质量测试均显示各组均有显着改善,但改变的程度这些测试在两组患者之间没有显着差异。内窥镜检查结果表明,术后12个月,两性霉素B治疗组的优势稍有改善。这些结果得出结论,对接受鼻息肉手术的患者使用两性霉素B鼻喷雾剂不会导致CT评分,临床症状或生活质量的显着改变。在内窥镜随访期间,在两性霉素B治疗组中观察到的更有利的临床方面并不对应于症状的改善。结合本研究得出的结论,作者讨论了有关CRS真菌病因学的可用争议数据。他们批判性地分析了七个近期临床研究的矛盾观察和结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号