...
【24h】

Clinical features of conjoined lumbosacral nerve roots versus lumbar intervertebral disc herniations.

机译:腰s神经根联合与腰椎间盘突出症的临床特征。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Unidentified nerve root anomalies, conjoined nerve root (CNR) being the most common, may account for some failed spinal surgical procedures as well as intraoperative neural injury. Previous studies have failed to clinically discern CNR from herniated discs and found their surgical outcomes as being inferior. A comparative study of CNR and disc herniations was undertaken. Between 2002 and 2008, 16 consecutive patients were diagnosed intraoperatively with CNR. These patients were matched 1:2 with 32 patients diagnosed with intervertebral disc herniations. Matching was done according to age (within 5 years), gender and level of pathology. Surgery for patients with CNR or disc herniations consisted of routine microsurgical techniques with microdiscectomy, hemilaminotomy, hemilaminectomy and foraminotomy as indicated. Outcomes were measured using the Oswestry Disability Index and the Short Form-36 Questionnaire. Clinical presentation, imaging studies and surgical outcomes were compared between the groups. Conjoined nerve root's incidence in this study was 5.8% of microdiscectomies performed. The S1 nerve root was mainly involved (69%), followed by L5 (31%). Patients with CNR tended to present with nerve root claudication (44%) compared to the radiculopathy accompanying disc herniations (75%). Neurologic deficit was less prevalent among patients with CNR. Nerve root tension tests were not helpful in distinguishing between the etiologies. Radiologist's suspicion threshold for nerve root anomalies was low (0%) and no coronal reconstructions were obtained. The surgeon's clinical suspicion accurately predicted 40% of the CNRs. Surgical outcomes did not differ between the cohorts regarding the rate of postoperative improvement, but CNR patients showed a trend toward having mildly worse long-term outcomes. Suspecting CNRs preoperatively is beneficial for appropriate treatment and avoiding the risk of intraoperative neural injury. With nerve root claudication and imaging suggestive of a "disc herniation", the surgeon should be alert to the differential diagnosis of a CNR. Treatment is directed at obtaining adequate decompression by laminectomy and foraminotomy to relieve the lateral recess stenosis. Outcomes can be expected to be similar to routine disc herniations.
机译:不明的神经根异常,最常见的是神经根联合(CNR),可能是脊柱外科手术失败以及术中神经损伤的原因。先前的研究未能在临床上从突出的椎间盘中识别出CNR,并发现其手术结果较差。对CNR和椎间盘突出症进行了比较研究。在2002年至2008年之间,连续16例患者在术中被诊断出患有CNR。这些患者与32例诊断为椎间盘突出症的患者按1:2比例匹配。根据年龄(5岁以内),性别和病理学水平进行匹配。 CNR或椎间盘突出症患者的手术包括常规显微外科手术技术,如所示,包括显微椎间盘切除术,半切开术,半椎板切除术和开孔术。结果的评估采用Oswestry残疾指数和36篇简表。比较两组之间的临床表现,影像学研究和手术结果。在这项研究中,联合神经根的发生率为进行的微解剖的5.8%。 S1神经根主要受累(69%),其次是L5(31%)。与伴有椎间盘突出的神经根病(75%)相比,CNR患者倾向于表现神经根c行(44%)。 CNR患者中神经功能缺损的发生率较低。神经根张力测试无助于区分病因。放射科医师对神经根异常的怀疑阈值较低(0%),未获得冠状重建体。外科医生的临床怀疑准确地预测了40%的CNR。两组之间的手术结局在术后改善率方面没有差异,但是CNR患者的长期结局呈轻度恶化趋势。术前怀疑CNR有助于适当治疗并避免术中神经损伤的风险。伴有神经根and行和影像学提示“椎间盘突出”,外科医生应警惕CNR的鉴别诊断。治疗的目的是通过椎板切除术和椎间孔切开术来获得足够的减压,以缓解外侧隐窝狭窄。预期结果与常规椎间盘突出症相似。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号