...
首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America >The 2008 Wenchuan earthquake and earthquake prediction in China
【24h】

The 2008 Wenchuan earthquake and earthquake prediction in China

机译:2008年汶川地震及中国地震预报

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

For historical reasons, earthquake prediction in China is government sanctioned and law regulated. During 1966-1976, coinciding with the political and social turmoil of the Cultural Revolution, there was an explosion of earthquake prediction. Enthusiasm climaxed with the prediction of the 1975 Haicheng earthquake, a prediction that was due mainly to the occurrence of an unusually pronounced foreshock sequence and the extraordinary readiness of some local officials of the time to issue imminent warning. Since the catastrophic Tangshan earthquake in 1976, there has been diminishing confidence in prediction and increasing emphasis on seismic risk mitigation. The M_w 7.9 Wenchuan earthquake of 12 May 2008 once again demonstrated the gloomy reality of earthquake prediction. In spite of the installation of massive precursor monitoring networks and an elaborate schedule of prediction conferences, no anomalous pattern was identified before this earthquake that would have enabled its prediction. Instead, the Wenchuan earthquake overwhelmingly demonstrated the vital importance of seismic risk mitigation. Different from Tangshan 1976, where seismic design was not required, such design was required for the Wenchuan area in 2008. Buildings that met the design standard suffered much less damage than those that did not. Notwithstanding, progress in practice lagged far behind the promulgation of regulations; stricter enforcement of seismic design provisions and wiser selection of construction sites would have prevented many deaths and greatly reduced the destruction of property. The prediction program in China has provided useful experience and taught many lessons. The most important lesson is that, regardless of its future potential, it is presently impractical to rely on prediction to prevent earthquake disasters. The practical approach is to strengthen the resilience of our built environment based on an assessment of seismic hazard.
机译:由于历史原因,中国对地震的预测受到政府的制裁和法律的监管。在1966年至1976年期间,正值文化大革命的政治和社会动荡之际,地震预报爆炸了。 1975年海城地震的预测使人们的热情高涨,这一预测主要是由于发生了异常明显的前震序列以及当时一些地方官员特别准备发出紧急警告。自1976年唐山大地震以来,人们对预测的信心不断下降,对减轻地震风险的重视日益增强。 2008年5月12日的7.9级汶川地震再次证明了地震预报的阴暗现实。尽管安装了大规模的前体监测网络,并制定了详尽的预报会议时间表,但在这次地震发生之前,没有发现任何异常模式可以进行预报。相反,汶川地震以压倒性优势证明了减轻地震风险的重要性。与唐山1976年不同,唐山不需要进行抗震设计,而2008年的汶川地区则需要进行抗震设计。达到设计标准的建筑物遭受的破坏要比没有设计标准的建筑物少得多。尽管如此,实践中的进展远远落后于法规的颁布;严格执行抗震设计规定和更明智地选择建筑工地将避免许多人丧生并大大减少财产损失。中国的预报计划提供了有益的经验,并教授了许多课程。最重要的教训是,不管未来的潜力如何,目前依靠预测来预防地震灾难都是不切实际的。实际的方法是根据地震危险性评估来增强建筑环境的弹性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号