...
【24h】

Comparison of four drugs for local treatment of burn wounds.

机译:烧伤创面局部治疗的四种药物比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Effective local treatment is very important in preventing wound infection and its generalization and ensuring successful skin grafting. The aim of our study is to compare the activity of four topical agents [deflamol (20 patients), polyvidone-iodine (21 patients), flammazine (silver sulphadiazine--SSD) (28 patients) and flammacerium (SSD with cerium nitrate) (five patients)] for treatment of patients with burns by confirming our clinical observations of their efficacy with comparative bacteriological investigations. The final estimation of our results showed the undoubted priority of flammazine and flammacerium over deflamol and polyvidone-iodine, as the treatment of all the patients with these two drugs gave very good and good results, respectively. In contrast, the results in 70% of the patients from the deflamol group and in 52.4% of those from the polyvidone-iodine group were unsatisfactory. At this stage we cannot find any significant differences in the antibacterial activity between flammazine and flammacerium. However, the excision of the firm eschars formed by flammacerium is easier and it gives the opportunity to postpone operation for a month or more. In conclusion we found suitable indications for preference of each of the topical agents included in our study.
机译:有效的局部治疗对于预防伤口感染及其泛滥和确保成功植皮非常重要。我们研究的目的是比较四种局部用药的活性[去氟酚(20例患者),聚维酮碘(21例患者),flammazine(磺胺嘧啶银--SSD)(28例患者)和amma(SSD硝酸铈)( [5名患者]],通过比较细菌学研究证实我们对疗效的临床观察,从而治疗烧伤患者。我们对结果的最终估计表明,在使用这两种药物的所有患者中,二种药物的治疗均获得了非常好的效果,因此,flammazine和flammacerium的优先级无疑要高于deflamol和polyvidone-碘。相比之下,在70%的地弗洛尔组患者和52.4%的聚维酮-碘组患者中,结果并不令人满意。在这一阶段,我们无法发现弗拉明嗪和氟草醚在抗菌活性上有任何显着差异。然而,由角cer形成的硬的切除更容易,并且有机会将手术推迟一个月或更长时间。总之,我们找到了适合我们研究中每种局部用药的适应症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号