...
首页> 外文期刊>Bee Culture >TEXAS COURT RULES
【24h】

TEXAS COURT RULES

机译:德州法院规则

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

An October 2003 decision from the Court of Appeals of Texas has held, as a matter of first impression for the courts of that state, that a beekeeper has a duty to provide a warning about the danger of bee stings. Although the decision is binding onlywithin the Court's Texas jurisdiction, it should be of interest to all persons involved with beekeeping. The facts behind the lawsuit began on September 7, 1994, when honey bee business owner John Black and his employee, Alejandro Mercado, decided to move some beehives that Black was buying from Curtis Wilhelrn, Wilhelm, a member of the Rio Grande Valley Beekeepers Association, was, like Black, active in the local beekeeping industry. To assist in the moving of the hives, Black asked Santos Flores Si, to assist him and Mercado on a onetime basis, Flores agreed and Black provided him with a protective suit and veil. At no time, however, was Flores told about possible medical risks associated with bee stings.
机译:作为该州法院的第一印象,得克萨斯州上诉法院于2003年10月做出的一项裁决认为,养蜂人有责任就蜂伤的危险提出警告。尽管该决定仅在德克萨斯州法院管辖范围内具有约束力,但涉及养蜂业的所有人都应对此感兴趣。诉讼的事实始于1994年9月7日,当时蜜蜂业务所有者约翰·布莱克(John Black)和他的雇员亚历杭德罗·梅尔卡多(Alejandro Mercado)决定移走布莱克从里奥格兰德河谷养蜂人协会成员威廉·柯蒂斯·威廉(Curtis Wilhelrn)购买的一些蜂箱。 ,像布莱克一样,活跃于当地养蜂业。为了帮助荨麻疹的移动,布莱克要求桑托斯·弗洛雷斯·西(Santos Flores Si)一次性协助他和梅尔卡多,弗洛雷斯同意,布莱克为他提供了防护服和面纱。但是,弗洛雷斯从未立即得知与蜜蜂st刺相关的医疗风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号