...
首页> 外文期刊>Europace: European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology >The value of adenosine test in the diagnosis of sick sinus syndrome: susceptibility of sinus and atrioventricular node to adenosine in patients with sick sinus syndrome and unexplained syncope
【24h】

The value of adenosine test in the diagnosis of sick sinus syndrome: susceptibility of sinus and atrioventricular node to adenosine in patients with sick sinus syndrome and unexplained syncope

机译:腺苷检测在诊断病态窦房结综合征中的价值:病态窦房结综合征和原因不明的晕厥患者窦房室结对腺苷的敏感性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aims Patients (pts) with sick sinus syndrome (SSS) and unexplained syncope show increased susceptibility of sinus and atrioventricular node (AVN) to intravenous adenosine, respectively. Our aim is to assess the diagnostic value of adenosine test in pts with SSS, as well as to evaluate the response of AVN to adenosine either in pts with unexplained syncope or in pts with syncope and known SSS. Methods and results The effect of adenosine administration on the sinus and AVN was studied in a population consisted of 19 pts with clinical SSS (group SSS), 7 pts with syncope of unknown origin (group SUO), and 12 control subjects (group C). We calculated the maximum corrected sinus node recovery time (CSNRT), after overdrive pacing of the atrium at cycle lengths of 600, 500, and 400 ms and compared this vafue.with the longest sinus pause, following adenosine administration corrected to the basic cycle length (ADSNRT). The longest R-R interval during atrioventricular block in response to adenosine injection (ADAVB) was also measured. Adenosine was given in a bolus dose of 0.15 mgr/kg through a femoral or large antecubital vein. There was a significant difference in the mean values of CSNRT among the three groups: group SSS (651 +- 228 ms) > group SUO (284 +- 100 ms) = group C (291 +- 117 ms), F(2.35) = 19.078, P = 0.000. A significant difference was also found with ADSNRT: group SSS (5437 +- 6863 ms) > group SUO (122 +- 120 ms) = group C (801 +- 1897 ms), F(2.35) = 4.513, P = 0.018. Using 525 ms as a cutoff value indicating sinus node dysfunction, CSNRT had a sensitivity of 74% and specificity of 100% for diagnosis of SSS while ADSNRT had 94% and 84%, respectively. Higher values of ADAVB in pts with SSS (10659 +-5872) and SUO (10026 +- 7092) in comparison with controls (3615 +- 5002) were measured, F(2.35) = 5.697, P= 0.007. No difference in the degree of ADAVB was found between the pts with SUO (10026 +- 7092 ms) and syncope in the presence of SSS (12058 +-6787 ms), F(1.15) = 0.356, P = 0.56.Conclusion Adenosine test appears to be at least comparable with CSNRT in making the diagnosis of SSS and may be considered as an alternative non-invasive test for confirmation of suspected SSS. No difference in the susceptibility of AVN to adenosine between the pts with syncope in the presence of SSS and those with unexplained syncope was found, suggesting that adenosine test cannot be used to diagnose atrioventricular block as the cause of syncope.
机译:目的患有病态窦房结综合征(SSS)和无法解释的晕厥的患者(pts)分别显示出静脉窦和腺苷对静脉窦和房室结(AVN)的敏感性增加。我们的目的是评估具有SSS的患者的腺苷测试的诊断价值,以及评估具有无法解释的晕厥的患者或具有晕厥和已知SSS的患者的AVN对腺苷的反应。方法和结果研究了腺苷对鼻窦和AVN的影响,该人群包括19例临床SSS(SSS组),7例来源不明的晕厥(SUO组)和12例对照受试者(C组) 。我们计算出在600、500和400 ms周期长度的心房过速起搏后,最大校正的窦房结恢复时间(CSNRT),并将此vafue与最长的窦性停顿进行比较,然后将腺苷给药校正为基本周期长(ADSNRT)。还测量了房室传导阻滞期间响应腺苷注射(ADAVB)的最长R-R间隔。通过股或大肘前静脉以0.15 mgr / kg的剂量推注腺苷。三组之间的CSNRT平均值存在显着差异:SSS组(651 +-228 ms)> SUO组(284 +-100 ms)= C组(291 +-117 ms),F(2.35) = 19.078,P = 0.000。 ADSNRT也发现了显着差异:SSS组(5437±6863 ms)> SUO组(122±120 ms)= C组(801±1897 ms),F(2.35)= 4.513,P = 0.018。使用525 ms作为指示窦房结功能障碍的临界值,CSNRT对SSS的诊断灵敏度为74%,特异性为100%,而ADSNRT分别为94%和84%。与对照组(3615 +-5002)相比,在SSS(10659 + -5872)和SUO(10026 +-7092)的患者中,ADAVB的测量值更高,F(2.35)= 5.697,P = 0.007。在SUS(10026 +-7092 ms)和晕厥患者(SSS)(12058 + -6787 ms),F(1.15)= 0.356,P = 0.56的患者之间,ADAVB的程度没有差异。结论腺苷试验在诊断SSS方面似乎至少可以与CSNRT相提并论,并且可以被视为确认可疑SSS的替代性非侵入性测试。在存在SSS的晕厥患者和没有原因的晕厥患者之间,AVN对腺苷的敏感性没有差异,这表明腺苷试验不能用于诊断房室传导阻滞为晕厥的原因。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号