...
首页> 外文期刊>Endoscopy: Journal for Clinical Use Biopsy and Technique >A meta-analysis comparing ProCore and standard fine-needle aspiration needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition
【24h】

A meta-analysis comparing ProCore and standard fine-needle aspiration needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition

机译:荟萃分析比较ProCore和标准细针抽吸针用于内镜超声引导下的组织采集

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background and study aims: To overcome the limitations associated with cytology, a uniquely designed needle (ProCore) was introduced in an effort to obtain a core of tissue under endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance. However, studies comparing the sample quality between ProCore and standard-design fine-needle aspiration (FNA) needles have yielded varying results. A systematic review and meta-analysis was therefore conducted to compare the performance of the ProCore and standard FNA needles when performing EUS-guided tissue acquisition.
机译:背景和研究目的:为了克服与细胞学相关的局限性,引入了一种独特设计的针(ProCore),以在内窥镜超声(EUS)的指导下获得组织的核心。但是,比较ProCore和标准设计的细针抽吸(FNA)针的样品质量的研究得出了不同的结果。因此,进行了系统的综述和荟萃分析,以比较在执行EUS引导的组织采集时ProCore和标准FNA针的性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号