...
首页> 外文期刊>Boundary-layer Meteorology >ACCURACY OF SONIC ANEMOMETERS: LAMINAR WIND-TUNNEL CALIBRATIONS COMPARED TO ATMOSPHERIC IN SITU CALIBRATIONS AGAINST A REFERENCE INSTRUMENT
【24h】

ACCURACY OF SONIC ANEMOMETERS: LAMINAR WIND-TUNNEL CALIBRATIONS COMPARED TO ATMOSPHERIC IN SITU CALIBRATIONS AGAINST A REFERENCE INSTRUMENT

机译:声光MO度的准确性:相对于参考仪器的原位校准,与大气层流风洞校准相比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Two Gill Solent Ultrasonic anemometers, models 1012R2 and 1210R3, were tested in field parallel measurements against a windvane based hot-film anemometer with additional sensors for temperature and wet-bulb temperature, the MIUU (MIUU: Meteorology Institute, Uppsala University) instrument. This instrument was shown to retain its precision from laminar wind-tunnel tests when used in atmospheric turbulent flow. This contrasts strongly to the observed results for the two sonic anemometers, which were first calibrated in laminar wind-tunnel flow. Individual three-dimensional calibration matrices were constructed, and were shown to reduce the remaining calibration uncertainty for the wind speed to 0.4-0.8% for all azimuths and for angles of attack within±40°. In the field intercomparison tests of the sonics against the MIUU instrument, it was found that the precision not only of the mean wind speed but of all second-order moments studied (variances and covariances, with and without temperature) deteriorated by a factor of typically three to four. Most of the scatter appears to be random, but in the case of the wind speed, a clear dependence on wind direction is found as well. It is concluded that the correction for the effect of the vertical supporting rods of the R2 and R3 instruments, which gives nearly perfect agreement for laminar flow, does not work entirely satisfactory in the natural turbulent flow. This, in turn, is likely to be so because of high sensitivity of the wake behind the cylindrical supporting rods to the character of the approach flow.
机译:两台Gill Solent超声波风速仪1012R2和1210R3在基于风向标的热膜风速仪和附加的温度和湿球温度传感器MIUU(MIUU:乌普萨拉大学气象研究所)仪器的现场平行测量中进行了测试。当在大气湍流中使用时,该仪器在层流风洞测试中保持了其精度。这与两个声速风速计的观测结果形成鲜明对比,这两个风速计首先在层状风洞流中进行了校准。构建了单独的三维校准矩阵,结果表明,对于所有方位角和在±40°内的迎角,风速的剩余校准不确定性均降低到0.4-0.8%。在针对MIUU仪器进行的超声波现场比对测试中,发现不仅平均风速的精度,而且研究的所有二阶矩(有和没有温度的方差和协方差)的精度都降低了通常三到四个。大部分散布似乎是随机的,但在风速的情况下,也发现对风向有明显的依赖性。结论是,对R2和R3仪器的垂直支撑杆的影响进行的校正(对于层流几乎完全一致)在自然湍流中不能完全令人满意。这又可能是由于圆柱形支撑杆后面的尾流对进近流的特性高度敏感而造成的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号