首页> 外文期刊>Boundary-layer Meteorology >Comparison of Boundary-Layer Profiles and Layer Detection by AMDAR and WTR/RASS at Frankfurt Airport
【24h】

Comparison of Boundary-Layer Profiles and Layer Detection by AMDAR and WTR/RASS at Frankfurt Airport

机译:法兰克福机场AMDAR和WTR / RASS对边界层轮廓和层检测的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

At Frankfurt airport (EDDF) vertical soundings of the lower atmosphere from two independent sources are available. One of them is a wind and temperature profiler (wind temperature radar and radio acoustic sounding system, WTR/RASS) located at the western end of the main pair of runways. The second source is aircraft meteorological data relay (AMDAR), i.e. measurements operationally collected by approaching and departing aircraft. Together, both offer a rare opportunity to compare the performance of these widely used systems. We use 1 year of continuous data to calculate systematic temperature and wind vector differences between both measurement systems. The differences show a clear season-dependent structure in conjunction with typical inversion heights. Possible causes for this behaviour are discussed. Second, we compare the ability of both systems to identify inversion and wind-shear layers above the airport. AMDAR-detected layers are typically higher than wind profiler detections. The layer base is usually detected with more agreement than the top. The mutual probability of detection of inversions is found to be mostly between 40 and 60%.
机译:在法兰克福机场(EDDF),可以从两个独立的来源获得低层大气的垂直声音。其中之一是位于主要跑道对西端的风和温度廓线仪(风温度雷达和无线电声测深系统,WTR / RASS)。第二个来源是飞机气象数据中继(AMDAR),即通过进近和离开飞机在操作上收集的测量值。两者共同提供了难得的机会来比较这些广泛使用的系统的性能。我们使用1年的连续数据来计算两个测量系统之间的系统温度和风向矢量差异。差异显示出明显的季节依赖性结构以及典型的反演高度。讨论了此行为的可能原因。其次,我们比较两种系统识别机场上方的反演层和风切变层的能力。 AMDAR检测到的层通常高于风廓线仪检测到的层。通常检测到的层基础要比顶层多。发现反演的相互概率主要在40%至60%之间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号