首页> 外文期刊>Mausam: Journal of the Meteorological Department of India >Simulation of climate change impact on water productivity of maize in central Punjab
【24h】

Simulation of climate change impact on water productivity of maize in central Punjab

机译:模拟气候变化对旁遮普中部玉米水生产力的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Field experiments were conducted at the Research Farm, Department of Climate Change and Agricultural Meteorology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana during kharif 2016 and 2017. Maize variety PMH-1 was sown with a row spacing of 60 cm and plant spacing of 20 cm on three dates viz., D_1-Third week of May, D_2-Second week of June and D_3- First week of July under two irrigation levels i.e., irrigation at IW: CPE of 1.00 (I_1) and 0.75 (I_2) and mulch viz. application of straw mulch @ 5 t ha~(-1) (M_1) and without mulch (M_2) in split plot design (SPD) with dates of sowing and mulch in main plots and irrigation levels in the sub-plots. Actual moisture depletion by the crop under different treatments was recorded by soil moisture depletion method. Among the dates of sowing, moisture extraction was observed to be highest under D_1 (540.5 and 477.5 mm), whereas among the irrigation and mulch levels, it was lower under IW/CPE = 0.75 (461.2 and 376.9 mm) and mulch application @ 5t/ha (473.0 and 387.1 mm) during both the seasons. The ET_0 was calculated by open-pan evaporation, Priestley-Taylor, FAO-56,Papadakis and CROPWAT models. Among all the four methods, the Priestley-Taylor method gave higher ET_0 in all three dates of sowing and it was close to open-pan evaporation values except in first date of sowing during 2016, in which ET_0 was higher in FAO-56 (602.4 mm)., The crop coefficients calculated by Papadakis method were comparatively higher (1.3 and 1.1 mm) as compared to that calculated by CROPWAT method (1.2 and 1.0 mm) and FAO-56 (1.0 and 1.1 mm) methods gave higher values of crop coefficients as compared to Priestley-Taylor method of DSSAT model (1.0 and 0.9 mm). The water use efficiency of maize was higher in D_2 (11.02 kg/ha-mm, 13.43 kg/ha-mm) w.r.t grain yield as compared to D_3 (10.72 kg/ha-mm, 12.97 kg/ha-mm) and Di (9.69 kg/ha-mm, 10.65 kg/ha-mm) w.r.t grain yield, during 2016 and 2017 respectively. Among mulch and irrigation treatment was higher in Mi
机译:2016 年和 2017 年期间,在卢迪亚纳旁遮普农业大学气候变化和农业气象系研究农场进行了实地实验。玉米品种PMH-1在3个日期播种,行距为60厘米,株距为20厘米,即5月D_1-3周、6月D_2-2周和7月D_3-7月第一周,在两个灌溉水平下播种,即灌溉:CPE为1.00(I_1)和0.75(I_2)和覆盖物,即施用秸秆覆盖物@5 t ha~(-1)(M_1)和无覆盖物(M_2)在分割地块设计(SPD)中,主地块的播种日期和覆盖日期以及子地块的灌溉水平。采用土壤水分消耗法记录了不同处理下作物的实际水分消耗。在播种日期中,在D_1(540.5 和 477.5 mm)下,水分提取量最高,而在灌溉和覆盖水平中,在 IW/CPE = 0.75(461.2 和 376.9 mm)和覆盖施用量 @ 5t/ha(473.0 和 387.1 mm)下,水分提取量较低。ET_0是通过开盘蒸发、Priestley-Taylor、FAO-56、Papadakis和CROPWAT模型计算的。在所有4种方法中,Priestley-Taylor方法在所有3个播种日期的ET_0均较高,并且接近露天蒸发值,但2016年的第一个播种日期除外,其中FAO-56的ET_0较高(602.4 mm),Papadakis方法计算的作物系数相对较高(1.3和1.1 mm)与 CROPWAT 方法(1.2 和 1.0 mm)和 FAO-56(1.0 和 1.1 mm)方法计算的作物系数值相比,DSSAT 模型的 Priestley-Taylor 方法(1.0 和 0.9 mm)更高。2016年和2017年,玉米D_2(11.02 kg/ha-mm、13.43 kg/ha-mm)w.r.t籽粒产量分别高于D_3(10.72 kg/ha-mm、12.97 kg/ha-mm)和Di(9.69 kg/ha-mm、10.65 kg/ha-mm)w.r.t籽粒产量。在覆盖物和灌溉中,Mi 的处理率较高

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号