首页> 外文期刊>Bioethics >The dangers of euthanasia and dementia: How Kantian thinking might be used to support non-voluntary Euthanasia in cases of extreme dementia
【24h】

The dangers of euthanasia and dementia: How Kantian thinking might be used to support non-voluntary Euthanasia in cases of extreme dementia

机译:安乐死和痴呆的危险:在极端痴呆的情况下,如何使用康德思想来支持非自愿安乐死

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Some writers have argued that a Kantian approach to ethics can be used to justify suicide in cases of extreme dementia, where a patient lacks the rationality required of Kantian moral agents. I worry that this line of thinking may lead to the more extreme claim that euthanasia is a proper Kantian response to severe dementia (and similar afflictions). Such morally treacherous thinking seems to be directly implied by the arguments that lead Dennis Cooley and similar writers to claim that Kant might support suicide. If rationality is the only factor in valuing a human life, then the loss of that rationality (however such loss might be defined) would allow us to use essentially utilitarian thinking in order to support non-voluntary euthanasia, since the patients themselves would no longer be moral agents that demand respect.
机译:一些作者认为,在极端痴呆的情况下,如果患者缺乏康德式道德代理人所要求的合理性,则可以采用康德式伦理学方法来证明自杀的合理性。我担心这种思路可能导致更极端的说法,即安乐死是康德人对严重痴呆(和类似疾病)的适当反应。导致丹尼斯·库利和类似作家声称康德可能支持自杀的论点直接暗示了这种道德上叛逆的思想。如果理性是评估人类生活的唯一因素,那么这种理性的丧失(无论如何可以定义这种丧失)将使我们能够使用本质上是功利主义的思维来支持非自愿安乐死,因为患者自己将不再成为要求尊重的道德主体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号