首页> 外文期刊>International Orthopaedics >Comparing navigation-based in vivo knee kinematics pre- and postoperatively between a cruciate-retaining and a cruciate-substituting implant.
【24h】

Comparing navigation-based in vivo knee kinematics pre- and postoperatively between a cruciate-retaining and a cruciate-substituting implant.

机译:比较基于十字定位的植入物和基于十字定位的植入物在术前和术后的基于导航的体内膝关节运动学。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Individual physiological knee kinematics are highly variable in normal knees and are altered following cruciate-substituting (PS) and cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We wanted to know whether knee kinematics are different choosing two different knee designs, CR and PS TKA, during surgery using computer navigation.For this purpose, 60 consecutive TKA were randomised, receiving either CR (37 patients) or PS TKA (23 patients). All patients underwent computer navigation, and kinematics were assessed prior to making any cuts or releases and after implantation. Outcome measures were relative rotation between femur and tibia, measured medial and lateral gaps and medial and lateral condylar lift-off.We were not able to demonstrate a significant difference in femoral external rotation between either group prior to implantation (7.9° CR vs. 7.4° PS) or after implantation (9.0° CR vs. 11.3° PS), both groups showed femoral roll-back. It significantly increased pre- to postoperatively in PS TKA. In the CR group both gaps increased, the change of the medial gap was significantly attributable to medial release. In the PS group both gaps increased and the change of the medial and of the lateral gap was significant. Condylar lift-off was observed in the CR group during 20° and 60° of flexion.This study did not reveal significant differences in navigation-based knee kinematics between CR and PS implants. Femoral roll-back was observed in both implant designs, but significantly increased pre- to postoperatively in PS TKA. A slight midflexion instability was observed in CR TKA. Intra-operative computer navigation can measure knee kinematics during surgery before and after TKR implantation and may assist surgeons to optimise knee kinematics or identify abnormal knee kinematics that could be corrected with ligament releases to improve the functional result of a TKR, whether it is a CR or PS design. Our intra-operative finding needs to be confirmed using fluoroscopic or radiographic 3D matching after complete recovery from surgery.
机译:在正常的膝盖中,各个生理膝部运动学变化很大,并且在进行十字形置换(PS)和十字形保持(CR)全膝关节置换术(TKA)后会发生变化。我们想知道在使用计算机导航的手术过程中,选择两种不同的膝关节设计(CR和PS TKA)膝关节运动学是否有所不同,为此,随机选择了60个连续的TKA,分别接受CR(37例)或PS TKA(23例) 。所有患者均进行了计算机导航,并在切割或释放之前以及植入后评估了运动学。结果是股骨和胫骨之间的相对旋转,测量的内侧和外侧间隙以及内侧和外侧con突抬起。我们无法证明植入前两组之间的股骨外旋转有显着差异(7.9°CR vs. 7.4) °PS)或植入后(9.0°CR vs 11.3°PS),两组均显示股骨回滚。 PS TKA术前和术后明显增加。在CR组中,两个间隙均增加,内侧间隙的变化明显归因于内侧释放。在PS组中,两个间隙都增加,内侧和外侧间隙的变化很明显。 CR组在屈曲20°和60°时观察到突抬起。这项研究没有发现CR和PS植入物在基于导航的膝关节运动学上有显着差异。在两种植入物设计中均观察到股骨回滚,但PS TKA术前至术后明显增加。在CR TKA中观察到轻微的中屈不稳定性。术中计算机导航可以测量TKR植入前后的手术过程中的膝关节运动学,并且可以帮助外科医生优化膝关节运动学或识别异常的膝关节运动学,可以通过韧带释放进行矫正,从而改善TKR的功能性结果(无论是否为CR)或PS设计。从手术中完全恢复后,我们需要使用透视或X射线3D匹配来确认我们的术中发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号