首页> 外文期刊>International Orthopaedics >Resistant tennis elbow: shock-wave therapy versus percutaneous tenotomy.
【24h】

Resistant tennis elbow: shock-wave therapy versus percutaneous tenotomy.

机译:耐网球肘:冲击波疗法与经皮腱切术。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Fifty-six patients who suffered from chronic persistent tennis elbow of more than six months duration were randomly assigned to two active treatment groups. Group 1 (n = 29) received high-energy extracorporeal shock wave treatment (ESWT; 1,500 shocks) at 18 kV (0.22 mJ/mm(2)) without local anaesthesia; group 2 (n = 27) underwent percutaneous tenotomy of the common extensor origin. Both groups achieved improvement from the base line at three weeks, six weeks, 12 weeks and 12 months post-intervention. The success rate (Roles and Maudsley score: excellent and good) at three months in the ESWT group was 65.5% and in the tenotomy group was 74.1%. ESWT appeared to be a useful noninvasive treatment method that reduced the necessity for surgical procedures.
机译:将56名持续时间超过六个月的慢性持续性网球肘患者随机分为两个积极治疗组。第1组(n = 29)在没有局部麻醉的情况下以18 kV(0.22 mJ / mm(2))接受了高能体外冲击波治疗(ESWT; 1,500次电击);第2组(n = 27)进行了常见伸肌来源的经皮腱膜切开术。两组在干预后三周,六周,十二周和十二个月时均较基线水平有所改善。 ESWT组三个月的成功率(Roles和Maudsley评分:优秀和优秀)在65%的患者中进行,而在腱切术组中的成功率为74.1%。 ESWT似乎是一种有用的无创治疗方法,减少了外科手术的必要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号