首页> 外文期刊>International journal of nursing studies >Critique on the conceptualisation of quality of life: a review and evaluation of different conceptual approaches.
【24h】

Critique on the conceptualisation of quality of life: a review and evaluation of different conceptual approaches.

机译:对生活质量概念化的批判:对不同概念方法的回顾和评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Over the past decades, the concept of quality of life has been of paramount importance for evaluating the quality and outcome of health care. Despite its importance, there is still no consensus on the definition or proper measurement of quality of life. Several concept analyses of quality of life have been published. However, they appear to have had a rather limited impact on how empirical studies are conducted. Therefore, we present an overview and critique of different conceptualisations of quality of life, with the ultimate goal of making quality of life a less ambiguous concept. We also describe six conceptual problems. These problems were used as criteria to evaluate the appropriateness of different conceptualisations. This evaluation suggests that defining quality of life in terms of life satisfaction is most appropriate, because this definition successfully deals with all the conceptual problems discussed. The result of our concept evaluation was not surprising for it corroborated the results ofseveral concept analyses and the findings of a structural equation modelling study. Based on the findings revealed by our review, we propose that the scientific community should revitalise the conceptual discussion on quality of life. Furthermore, our findings can assist researchers in developing more rigourous quality-of-life research.
机译:在过去的几十年中,生活质量的概念对于评估卫生保健的质量和结果至关重要。尽管它很重要,但对生活质量的定义或适当衡量仍未达成共识。生活质量的几种概念分析已经发表。但是,它们似乎对实证研究的方式影响很小。因此,我们提出了对生活质量的不同概念的概述和批评,其最终目标是使生活质量成为一个不太模糊的概念。我们还描述了六个概念性问题。这些问题被用作评估不同概念的适当性的标准。该评估表明,根据生活满意度来定义生活质量是最合适的,因为该定义成功地解决了所讨论的所有概念问题。我们的概念评估结果不足为奇,因为它证实了数个概念分析的结果以及结构方程模型研究的结果。根据我们的审查揭示的发现,我们建议科学界应重新振兴关于生活质量的概念性讨论。此外,我们的发现可以帮助研究人员开展更严格的生活质量研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号